URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[nul-points]

hi Luc

you're welcome - no problem about sharing those suggestions ...don't forget they're just extending the SS SPDT circuit Groundloop adapted for you, so the EF members will need that too, for the MOSFET gate switching

  (http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,5438.msg122802.html#msg122802) 

looking forward to seeing how the water-plasma ideas develop

all the best
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

[Groundloop]

Luc,

I have no problem with sharing. Everything I post on the Internet is free ware.

Good luck with your research.

Groundloop.

[turbo]

Okay so here is a little visualization of what is happening. 

[gotoluc]

hi Luc

you're welcome - no problem about sharing those suggestions ...don't forget they're just extending the SS SPDT circuit Groundloop adapted for you, so the EF members will need that too, for the MOSFET gate switching

  (http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,5438.msg122802.html#msg122802) 

looking forward to seeing how the water-plasma ideas develop

all the best
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

Hi Sandy, thanks for making it clear for the MOSFET switching.

Since you mention switching! I have a question about it. Do you think inductor (L1) would have a hot spot (power efficiency) if we had the ability to adjusted the duty cycle of Q1?  if so, do you think that same duty cycle would work on the discharge of Q2 ?  if not. then two 555 circuits would be needed?  if so, then is there a way (circuit) to keep them from not overlapping?

Sorry for all the chain questions.

Luc

[resonanceman]

Hi Sandy, thanks for making it clear for the MOSFET switching.

Since you mention switching! I have a question about it. Do you think inductor (L1) would have a hot spot (power efficiency) if we had the ability to adjusted the duty cycle of Q1?  if so, do you think that same duty cycle would work on the discharge of Q2 ?  if not. then two 555 circuits would be needed?  if so, then is there a way (circuit) to keep them from not overlapping?

Sorry for all the chain questions.

Luc

Luc

Most  of the   experments I  am planning  require a PMW with  controllable frequency   pulse width and   voltage . 

From  the  data sheet for   the LM 555       the second  circuit example is for   a   astable operation

The   frequecy and  and    dwell time  can be set  with  Rb ad C1

The   output   would go to the trigger  of the  second timer   set up as example 4      ( PMW )

The   bias of   the input  pin     would  set the   pulse  width .


I  was planning on using  a  556  chip ........ 2  555s on  a single  chip.


gary