Hubbard coil

[aleks]

Look at the pdf I linked.  The Hubbard device is not so different from the TPU or a Tesla Magnifier.  What other means of energy magnification is known, other than what is termed "radiant electricity" or "radiant current" or "radiant energy"?

Well, I think if you are creating a vortex it will be a constant magnifier. TPU is a pulsating magnifier. The basis is same: creation of field of difference in aether's density (mass at will, mass effect even ). Beside that there was speculation that SM TPU does not use any kind of pulsing.

Myths tell that Tesla was a master of Ball Lightning among other things... Ball Lightning may be in fact an electricity trapped in a mass field.

[Grumpy]

@Grump

:-*o

I guess Nikola Tesla didn't understand his own devices, just like SM had no clue either ehh grumps?

Aren't we an egotistical.......... (add your own seriously colorful yet somewhat sarcastic definitive here.)

You speak much about others "taking little blue pills". I seriously suggest you quit the yellow and black ones. Follow Tesla's example and drop stimulants (among others) altogether.

You sent me to the link, and yes the book is available in partial, at the link you sent me. Like I said before, I came across no new information not known to me.

Funny how egotistical pricks call the egotistical pricks egotistical pricks - I'm sure there is a nice Latin saying for this - LOL!

That link with the book excerpt was just an excerpt and contains nothing new.  So, you have not acquired the book and therefore did not read the passage that I mentioned and there can only speculate that am full of crap.

The paragraph I referenced is on page 100 of that book Tesla states the following:

There are two ways in which you can operate is you have a reciever of that kind.  (Tesla is refering to his system depicted in patent 645,576) One is by linking, closely, your working circuit with the primary excited circuit.  The other is by linking it loosely, and then working up the pressure by resonance.  You will find that you can do much better, if you have such a device, to produce the necessary pressure by turns, than by resonant rise, because if you want to excite it by resonance you have to link only a few lines; start with a very low electromotive force and work it up.  But, if you have such a device as I have described, you can obtain any pressure you like by a few secondary turns.  I have invented such an instrument and have demonstrated its efficacy.

So, just like Richard Hull found out in his own experiments, resonant rise will only get you so far.  It's just a means to an end, and not necessarily the best means.

Now, I understand that you and you only are capable of understanding the works of our dear Mr. Tesla and the prestigious SM, and that us other inferior intellects are incapable of grasping even the basic concepts as put forth by these two esteemed individuals, and must therefore bow to your superior understandings and revelations, since YOU ALONE can be expert in these matters.

It is obvious that your understandings transcend all demonstrable reality, and that all educational learning must therefore submit to your interpretations of reality.

Now, show me ANY working OU device made by your hand, in humble demonstration of your superior excellence, so that we may all bow to your clarity of thought.......

Do I need to repeat anything for clarity of understanding?  Or do I need to use smaller words.

Paul Andrulis

I do not show "proof" of anything - this is my golden rule and has served me well.  Anyone in a proper frame of mind and with an understanding of the forces that run the show will also not show proof publicly.  That is the "rule of disclosure" that you asked for.  So, if you ever get something good going - keep it discrete or you will learn the hard way.  Now scoff and think that I'm full of crap all you want - it won't make it any less real - so, by all means try to prove me wrong.  Aside from this, I have agreements with friends not to discuss certain things.  For example, I recently mentioned AG (anti gravity - which is a bad term), but I never discuss it.

Niether you nor Z.Monkey has offered any explanation of why the Hubbard device has an automobile distributor from an 8-cylinder engine, driven by a motor.  I'm sure your vast intellect, which towers over all around you, can offer an adequate explanation.

Also, why does Hubbard use an 11.25 KV DC power supply?  Again, I await your insightful explanation that opens our eyes to the light of your supreme intellect.

If the Hubbard device works by some sort of rotating resonance, why are the cores open?  Why are the coils not formed into a ring so that the magnetic field is coupled at the core ends?  Surely this would be a better path for a rotating magnetic field.

[Grumpy]

Well, I think if you are creating a vortex it will be a constant magnifier. TPU is a pulsating magnifier. The basis is same: creation of field of difference in aether's density (mass at will, mass effect even ). Beside that there was speculation that SM TPU does not use any kind of pulsing.

Myths tell that Tesla was a master of Ball Lightning among other things... Ball Lightning may be in fact an electricity trapped in a mass field.

You are on the correct path, Aleks!

[giantkiller]

Howdy Y'all,

EMDevices, GiantKiller, CC: Ramset...
OK, answers are ambiguous as usual, I will extrapolate.

The "EMD" Core will get wound with the Cook coils.  The windings for both the primary and secondaries of the primary cores will get wound in the same direction relative to the end of the whole device.  So, looking at the device from the machine screw cap end of the device,  all windings will be turned counterclockwise.  This will orient all flux flow in the same direction.  When we introduce a DC pulse from a battery the current continues to flow in the original direction and we have a pulsating DC waveform which travels around the periphery of the device in the primary cores.

The Ring Oscillator Core will get the original windings I had intended to use.  These are also wound in the same orientation except that we will only have one winding per core.  Again the flux flows in the same direction for each core.  Introducing a DC pulse will generate a pulsating DC waveform which travels around the periphery of the device in the primary cores.

Both wiring schemes produce an infinite loop around the device.  I had planned on using a "Kill" switch to break this path for both devices.  A momentary start switch will also be used to momentarily apply the direct current to start the device.  I want to make the center, output coils on both the devices the same so that we can compare habaneros to habaneros.  The output coils will have an external terminal block connection to allow easy connection to different loads.  I'll make schematics for both devices, just for the sake of having decent readable documentation, just in case someone wants to make a Z.Monkey Coil in 100 years...

Blessed Be Brothers...

Hi,
Sorry about the ambiguity. Build a small portion of it to test if need be. Even the slightest advance in your experience past any new effect or for that matter progression into a nirvana moment is worth it. I wound some coils in the beginning based on transformer specifications. Then I found out how standard transformer design stops dead. You do what you can to break over that threshold of normalicy and you will never be the same. The world we live in is a very stupid place. Evil controls its every step. I am glad that I have seen things that evil men fear. Because now I have access to things that are pure evil to the evil yet good for mankind. That is what Tesla truly saw after his designs.

None of my neighbors know what I do. But now I have the insight to look upon the morase of society and shake my head in disbelief at their entrapment.

Truck on and do not be disuaded by time or events. Make your reality come true.

--giantkiller. Beyond the Noise.

[z.monkey]

Niether you nor Z.Monkey has offered any explanation of why the Hubbard device has an automobile distributor from an 8-cylinder engine, driven by a motor.  I'm sure your vast intellect, which towers over all around you, can offer an adequate explanation.

Howdy Y'all,

Here ya go!  The distributor is distributing the high voltage pulses to the coils on the device.  In this case he is artificially distributing the energy around the periphery of the coil.  This is the forced, not the natural, way to generate the spinning magnetic fields.  The natural way would to place all the coils in a series loop.  The series loop works out its own resonant frequency.  While the forced loop would have to be tuned by varying the speed of the motor driving the distributor.  It is clear to me now that the method used to achieve the resonance is less important than achieving resonance.  It can be done many ways.  The spinning resonance in the peripheral cores generates a vortex longitudally in the center core.  This is where the "Radiant" energy is collected and utilized.  The radiant energy is sucked into the coil from the surrounding environment where it breaks down into higher energy particles and is collected by the center core.  The term radiant energy refers to the energy available in the form of Soft Particles which have their origin in the energy that we receive from the Sun.

PS Grumpy, sorry I called your version of the Hubbard Coil absurd.  Obviously it is a later design, and is far more powerful than the "normally aspirated" version I am building.  The one that is pulsed with the 11.5KV could potentially power and electrogravity spacecraft.  Is this what you have been working on?  Cool!

Blessed Be Brothers...