Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hubbard coil

Started by EMdevices, July 01, 2008, 05:03:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

giantkiller

Absolutely Sir.

This also has the same artifacts as the Kunel devices.
Flux flow, flux squeezing, 2 coils. I have already done this but with rough tuning.

I have seen what this all does. But I am not done, yet.

--giantkiller.

giantkiller

Quote from: Grumpy on July 16, 2008, 06:57:04 PM
Anyone see how close Dollard's / Naudin's TEM / LMD wave test is to this?  Hmm?  Sideways inductors?  Strange coincidence?  Magnetic field comes out the end, our field comes out the side.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lmdtem.htm



This has been in my signature for a year now. ;)

--giantkiller.

wattsup

@EM

You know how long we had worked on these Cook Coils. I have three pairs, each pair different but I think I will connect them together just to see "wattsup". lol

@all

Don't confuse the Cook coil to the Hubbard vertical coils. You can see the primary is wound from top to bottom, unlike the Cook coil that is about 3/5ths. The Cook Coils were not electro magnets, the Hubbard coils are. So why are they electro magnets if they are using two coils on an iron rod. A regular electro-magnet only needs one coil on an iron core. Well, consider that with one impulse on a primary your are producing two effects. One of a magnetic field on the iron rod and one of power transfer to the secondary coil. lol

I would venture that the 8 point distributor is being fed by a 1:100 ratio transformer (it is shown in one of the photos of the Hubbard device under the distributor and some meters). Feed 120 volts to this transformer and produce 12000 volts to the distributor. The distributor hits a vertical coil primary, makes an iron rod magnetic field imparted on the collector and also produces 120 volts on the secondary that is fed back to the 1:100 ratio transformer input that produces another 12000 volts to the distributor that then hits the next vertical coil, etc, etc. I don't think the center coil and the outer primary are connected in parallel as shown in Grumpy's diagram as there would be no advantage to this.

This way, you are producing a rotating magnetic field over the center collector and you are sending the impulse power back to the beginning of the circuit. If you do this at 60hz, that's 480 iterations per second, or 3600 rpm with 28800 iterations per minutes.

If the distributor is not to hit each of the 8 primaries in succession, testing other coil series or parallel schemes would be very easy. Opposing coils could be in parallel or series and the distributor could then hit each opposing pair twice per revolution thus doubling the primary strikes, or more per cycle. This device could be made in many many ways.

giantkiller

@wattsup,

Absolutely for the many, many ways. I was flipping the rat shack coils many ways over and around the iron wire bundles. This iron wire loop configuration represents 1of the 8 coil paths. I am thinking that without the air gap on the top and bottom of Grumpy''s unit you would need less voltage. In other words I would take the PMH I built and reproduce it 7 more times. Right now I could do a total of 4 with my inventory. Stand them up and cable tie a straight leg of each path together into a bundle of 4 for the center. Kunel.

So in looking at the test i did with the iron wire loop and the 2 coils I had 100' for 26awg for a primary. I had a 40' 24awg bifilar sense coil. The turns are very close to 2:1 and even closer to 2:1 with the difference in mass of the two wire gauges.

So while everybody else is going towards the high voltage I believe I have the next step for lower voltage. If I don't achieve the desired higher voltage effect I can guarantee I can show some way flipped out signatures. And have another cool desktop device. I have never tried iron in the conduction path of a stun gun circuit. And this step is set up for the eventual high voltage input parameter.

OMG. If you look at the Deyo ring you can see 3 rings of differing length paths. You could use 1 freq and have 3 different speed rotating fields zooming around.

--giantkiller.

giantkiller

Away from bench so,

Here is what I see to do.
Magnets on bottom part of loops, not shown.

--giantkiller.