Hubbard coil

[z.monkey]

Howdy Grumpy,

Were trying to replicate the original Hubbard Coil here.  The one from 1919.  The one that was just coils on iron cores.  No radium or high voltage drivers..  Last night I was reviewing some old documents that Pese had provided.  One had a picture of Hubbard in 1919 with his hand on the device.  This was the smaller one we all read about in the newspaper articles.  The device in the picture was 6 inches long and maybe 5 inches in diameter.  This is what we are after.  I did also see a picture of what you are talking about, from 1956, with the motor, distributor, and a vertical Hubbard coil that was maybe 18 inches tall.  What I am pursuing here is a solid state electric generator.  I think Hubbard figured that out.  While I think that your plan to build this coil is valid, it is not the path that I want to take.  I want to build the most simple device based on Hubbard's original plan in the most cost effective and simple way possible.  Then thoroughly document it so that other people can easily replicate it.  Of course all of this is in a state of flux, and the simplest, easiest way maybe to use a capacitive discharge ignition to drive the coils.  I have not had any personal success with is project yet.  So, in the end your way may be best, but I have to explore all avenues anyway to ferret out the right one.  So why don't you get to work on that how to guide...

http://www.linux-host.org/energy/shubbard.html

Blessed Be Brothers...

[Grumpy]

I want to build the most simple device based on Hubbard's original plan in the most cost effective and simple way possible.  Then thoroughly document it so that other people can easily replicate it. 

An honorable goal.  I'll get to work on that guide...

[z.monkey]

Howdy Y'all,

Thanks Grumpy, working together we can help free the world of the Energy Robber Barons.

EMDesigns, your Cook Transformer setup is next on my agenda.  The eight primary coils in series are not doing what I had hoped so I am moving on to your original vision.  Eight Cook transformers hooked up in an infinite loop around the center core.  Each coils secondary will be hooked to the next coils primary.  We can do this two ways, straight through or alternating, depending on how we want the flux to flow in the primary cores.  If I wire the coils straight across it will create an alternating pattern in the flux field, core 1 +, core 2 -, core 3 +...  If I cross wire the cores then the flux will all flow in the same direction, core 1 +, core 2 +, core 3 +...  What do you think?  I was going to try several methods of stimulating the circuit.  Number 1 a jolt of DC from a battery.  Number 2 a square wave.  Number 3 a synthesized alternating current from my analog driver board.  And number 4 a synthesized alternating current with a step up EI core transformer.

GiantKiller, any results from the bench test of Gumby?  I really like the flux pathways on that one.  Maybe flux conduits?  Flux raceway?

Blessed Be Brothers...

[giantkiller]

no on eis going to build this?   If you are waiting for the "How To Guide" - forget it. 

I told you exactly how it works.  It ain't rocket science.

I never know who you are talking to.
I showed up with a 4 channel device instead of an eight channel. I already mentioned my safety and operational specs. I plug this in tonight and see. It is physically programmable and can partially self destruct when things get out of hand.

The two types of operation are resonant and non-resonant. In resonancy the artifact achieved is resonant rise. In non-resonancy the energy transfers from coil to coil seeking resonancy. It has been mentioned that this device is self tuning. When the damped wave dampens to resonancy, the coils all become tuning forks. Kind of like a choir of angels getting in tune. '1khz, 2khz, 3khz, 4khz, 5khz' quotes Tesla.

Lol. I will call it EMGumby! Son of EMDevices thread.

--giantkiller. I think it is a doorbell to the heavens.

[Localjoe]

Howdy GiantKiller,

Another observation, when the square wave goes low the ringing starts and looks like it is increasing in amplitude.  Then the square wave goes high and the ringing stops with the direct current.  Try giving it only one pulse, high then low, and let the ringing continue.  See if the amplitude goes higher.  You may have the brass ring there, no pun intended.

Theoretically you are generating a vortex in the ether.  The longer the ringing continues the larger the vortex will become drawing more and more magnetic flux through the cluster of coils.  The limiting factor is the physical size of the inductor cluster and the size of each inductor.  So there should be an upper limit to the amplitude.  What that is I don't know.  Also see if you can measure the frequency of the ringing.  There should be some relationship between the size and number of the coils and the frequency.

I think you have done it, you found the free energy demon, at least in one way.  We should be able to access this energy in many ways.

Excellent work...

Blessed Be Brothers...

I think you hit the nail on the head .. "try giving it only one pulse, high then low, and let the ringing continue.  See if the amplitude goes higher"  Its not that its a high or low pulse its adding to the chord.

Picture the keely device you hit the tonic then you hit the 3rd and the 5th and now you hear the chord ringing with the same clairity of the original "tonic" note but sounding much more rich and full  Like playing an open g chord but putting your pinky down too on the high e string . Makes the chord sound much more full.   So by "striking the chord"  you get all the meat inside it.  Just throwin this out there.