Hubbard coil

[innovation_station]

great job monkey it looks awsome!!

yep relays melt reeds burn out fets blow up

that is a great indication of extra engery.,... eh?

sounds like you need a cap on your output then switched so you dont blow shit up  just as the 0 zone

keep it up

ist

@ grumpy to switch current is ok!!  but 1 must take proper percautions to avoid being KILLED... it is all good as long as your device is setup to deal with the returning CURRENT!!!  if it is not ....  well   Z knows what will happin...

i recomend a tesla diode....  built through inductance allowing but 1 path...

[altium]

Hi, z.monkey.
Do you make measuring of input-output powers and COP? Have you COP>1?

[z.monkey]

Howdy Altium,

I am in testing now.  I have been having some problems driving the Infinity Transformer.  This is all documented on the Infinity Coil thread.  I'll publish the results as soon as I have them...

Blessed Be Brothers and Sisters...

[Bob Smith]

Hi Folks,
In the TPU Facts & Test Results thread, there were some interesting comments made that might apply here.  First, an interesting observation on coil winding from Godmode (see:  http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4491.msg120714.html#msg120714 )--

"Basically, if we take two conventional coils, and connect them in
series, but orient them such that the poles of the two coils are in
opposition, what is often called 'bucking fields', we will find that the
total inductance is greater than that of a single coil.  The total
energy stored in the fields of the two coils is not significantly
effected by their orientation, and the system is highly inductive.

All we have done is to distort the flux, we have not canceled ANY flux
at all.

On the other hand, if we were to construct a bifilar coil with exactly
the same ammount of wire, we would find that the coil had nearly no
inductance at all, and stores no significant energy in the form of a
magnetic field."

Moving down in that thread, Grumpy states:
(See: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4491.msg120720.html#msg120720)
"...then you take several pairs of coils with there slight ether compressing effect and place them in a circle such that the successive pairs can couple and entrain the aether compressed by the previous pairs then you just let it spin like an aether turbine - and a tubine is just a big compressor - CCW in northern and CW in southern  - and it spins up compressing more and more - there is a limit of course so no black holes or supernovas. 

Now you have compressed the field - how do you get power from this?"

I've been working on another project, but have been turning this one over in my mind a few weeks while following along.  Now I'm wondering if Godmode's idea might be worth incorporating into a Hubbard Coil style design.  Does anyone consider this method of winding (ie. coils in opposition to produce bucking effect) worthwhile?  I'm partial to trifilar winding, and am wondering if two windings set up as Godmode suggested might be somehow integrated with a third.  Perhaps the 2 bucking coils could be trifilar themselves, ora third coil could be wrapped around the whole unit.
Guess I'd better get experimenting... )

I'm thinking of using a ferrite tube for the centre coil and 5 ferrite rods for outside.  If I don't post anything in the next month or so, it means I've been sucked down the black hole gumpy warned about :0)

Any comments/ideas/suggestions?
B

[wattsup]

@Bob Smith

The main difference with the Hubbard coil is they are not side by side so such a scheme of having like poles next to each would not be effective.