Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hubbard coil

Started by EMdevices, July 01, 2008, 05:03:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

AbbaRue

Just for reference purposes this device is found at FEG 5-35.
The devices mentioned there before this one have a lot in common with it too.

PaulLowrance

Hi,

Is there a good detailed photo of the Hubbard coil?

I think there's a reasonable chance it was a legit device, but he and his family/friends were merely threatened beyond his control, and merely gave up.  Regarding the Hubbard coil being legit, zpenergy.com says it well -->

Quote from zpenergy.com,
"Hubbard, when speaking to the press said the device generated 280A at 125V which is 35kW, or roughly equivalent to about 45HP. While claiming early on that his device drew it's energy from the atmosphere, later, Hubbard recanted, saying the device drew power from radioactive materials, rather from thin air, and that his earlier claims were subterfuge, intended to throw off anyone who might try to usurp his patent rights. If this is the case, Hubbard's device would be the most powerful nuclear battery ever created, and as early as 1919, easily making it the first."

This idea that Hubbard, who was said to have been broke, somehow obtained nuclear reactive material (enriched), and made the very first nuclear power source in history, is ridiculous. Some people have the hobby of finding uranium, but this natural occurring uranium is not enriched uranium, and is not going to be powering that 35KW motor! The idea is just absurd. To this day, very few countries can produce enriched uranium.

Thanks,
PL

turbo

Well surely T. Henry. Moray also used a radioactive detector in his setup, but the power was comming from the large antenna that Moray spun over a large lake to reflect the waves and pump the ionospheric resonance.
His device was putting out 50Kw.
It seems he was using the D- Layer of the ionosphere and if so the frequency would be right around +/- 5,5 Mhz.
Tesla and the pierce arrow also used antenna wires and also seems to run on cosmic radiation.

Marco


innovation_station

Quote from: -[marco]- on December 29, 2008, 04:04:52 AM
Well surely T. Henry. Moray also used a radioactive detector in his setup, but the power was comming from the large antenna that Moray spun over a large lake to reflect the waves and pump the ionospheric resonance.
His device was putting out 50Kw.
It seems he was using the D- Layer of the ionosphere and if so the frequency would be right around +/- 5,5 Mhz.
Tesla and the pierce arrow also used antenna wires and also seems to run on cosmic radiation.

Marco

i dont beleave any radio active crap was used....  ever!!!!

MISLEADING INFO !!!  POURPOUSLY PLANTED

hey i  got an idea go grab that uraimium and smear it on your spark gap ... YEA that will cover it up confuse people and cause harm

WE ARE DEALING WITH POTIENCIALS ...  POS AND NEG   HOT AND COLD !!!!

ballanced  interchange ..... ;D

but ride down your own path  :P

i have found my own  8)

ist!
To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!