Hubbard coil

[Paul-R]

There's a snag with Hubbard. Iron tube is pretty much unobtainable.
And too many suppliers don't know the difference between iron
and steel. Even wrought iron is often steel.

Does anyone knopw where to get iron tube?

[forest]

Paul-R

How can we distinguish  them ?

[quarktoo]

Paul-R

How can we distinguish  them ?

Why would you bother. The properties of the inductor are what matter, not what it is made of.

Secondly, to suggest the Hubbard coil would be impossible without cast iron is silly. Hubbard appeared to use welding rods in his inductors from the photos.

The term iron is used pretty loosely. Steel is 100% iron with a carbon treatment.

[sigma16]

If the Hubbard coil is magnetic in any way, why the distributor?  Sounds like he was applying some HV to each of the outer coils sequentially.

Any mention of a static magnetic field in this device, or a car battery to start it?  Ah- ha! striking the cores!

[quarktoo]

If the Hubbard coil is magnetic in any way, why the distributor?  Sounds like he was applying some HV to each of the outer coils sequentially.

Any mention of a static magnetic field in this device, or a car battery to start it?  Ah- ha! striking the cores!

Oh, it's you Grumpy. You're back like a bar slut with a drug resistant strain of the clap. Miss me? :-)

Drunken bar slut said:

If the Hubbard coil is magnetic in any way, why the distributor?  Sounds like he was applying some HV to each of the outer coils sequentially.

You need a inductive element for the supercurrent to exist in and the spark gap is probably used to charge up (accelerate) the supercurrent. That would be my guess if the distributor was there at all.

I have doing a bit of research on this subject today and think I will have to pass on the Hubbard build for now. Barbat seems to be the only authority on this subject willing to disclose.

http://www.levitronicsenergy.com/science.htm

I love this quote since he is alluding to my statement that electricity is a result of mass to atomic energy conversion:

Barbat said:

This overlooked energy source can be harnessed by knowing that inductive energy is not conveyed by magnetic lines of force but by directional photon energy.

Barbat also states that the center coil acts like a radio transmit antenna which I agree.

I also think Barbat missed a much easier method to accomplish his objective. Lead tartrate and Iron would have to be two of the cheaper things on the planet. Resonate the iron at 21.5MHZ and I think the subsequent BETA emission would give you something interesting.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20100304976.pdf

Here is another quote from Barbat which validates what I have been preaching to deaf ears:

"Because LMEs accelerate faster than normal electrons, they radiate extra energy from any acceleration they receive. Larmor (1) showed that photon energy radiates from a moving charge in proportion to the square of its acceleration. Superconductors, with an electron mass 1/10,000 that of normal electrons (2) are accelerated 10,000 times faster than normal, so the centripetal acceleration of a supercurrent around a closed superconducting coil gives off a calculated 10,000 X 10,000 = 100,000,000 times more energy (acceleration squared) than is used to charge up the supercurrent ."


E=MC2
E=MC2
E=MC2