Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic OU principle, You should really take a look at this !

Started by Butch, July 02, 2008, 01:01:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Hello, newton2!
I read all your posts very carefully, because I am of the opinion that you are one of the true brilliant jewels in this dark mineshaft of ideas. Sometimes it's a bit hard to decode what you are saying but it is always worthwhile to make the effort to understand you.
I agree--there are certain situations where the fields we normally consider to be "conservative" may, and I emphasize, MAY, be "tricked" in order to yield positive work from a closed integral. But the conditions necessary to work this trick are going to be difficult to achieve, and probably involve extremely high electric (or maybe magnetic or gravitic) scalar field strengths and steep vector gradients.
In the meanwhile, certain well-travelled paths in milder territories are known to lead to more-or-less costly dead ends, which is why it pays to attend to one's homework before hitting the drawing board.

broli

TK if you can't do it don't think it's impossible or even difficult.The solutions are simple when we see the answers. Myself I'm starting to lean less on the gravity wheel side. Sure it would be something to have a runner, but it will have to be rather big if you plan on energy production. This is why I'm leaning more heavily on electro magnetic systems. My true goal is to find and replicate what Tesla has found in his labs 100 years ago.

derricka

Has anyone here heard from Butch lately?  Considering that he started this thread, his absence is getting noticeable.
It would be be nice to hear from him, even if just to say hello.

BEP

Quote from: derricka on January 12, 2009, 08:22:12 PM
Has anyone here heard from Butch lately?  Considering that he started this thread, his absence is getting noticeable.
It would be be nice to hear from him, even if just to say hello.

He said he was applying for a patent. I wished him well and that was the last I expected to hear from him.

Either he realized trying to make use of a supposed gradient was a mistake or he did discover something useful. Either way, I expected that would be the end.

TinselKoala

Quote from: broli on January 06, 2009, 11:22:19 AM
TK if you can't do it don't think it's impossible or even difficult.The solutions are simple when we see the answers. Myself I'm starting to lean less on the gravity wheel side. Sure it would be something to have a runner, but it will have to be rather big if you plan on energy production. This is why I'm leaning more heavily on electro magnetic systems. My true goal is to find and replicate what Tesla has found in his labs 100 years ago.

I agree mostly. That's why I am always careful to say that just because I couldn't replicate or produce an effect, doesn't mean it isn't there. And that's also why I try to get people to specify their hypotheses very well--define constructs, make predictions that are testable, and so forth. If a well designed experiment to test a well-posed hypothesis gives a null result, over and over, then we can "take a hint" and move on. On the other hand, if the effect is produced, and can be shown to be a result of an "ordinary" that is conventional physical cause, that's also an important result. Systems that, out of the starting gate, must violate known physical laws and principles in order to function as planned, shouldn't be allowed to distract creative and energetic researchers by enticing them down garden paths that are well-travelled and lead nowhere.