The One Million Dollar HHO Challenge is launched

[icanbeatbob]

@xjet,

You could be completely correct in you assumptions. Hell, for that matter, maybe there was a lot of rain storms at that time so he slowed his driving down. Many unknown possibilities for the increase due to one or several miscalculations. But, I do believe more in lines with HeairBear.

With the amount of money you say you are willing to put up, why don't you get a couple of ace mechanics, get a couple of old cars and try it. What is your agenda? If they make that much money to do this, then surely they would just spend very little and do it for themselves. Makes good business sense to me.

You seem so dead set against this, it's hard to believe you would ever accept it if it were true.

No disrespect intended

Brad

ps, In my lifetime, I have seen science proven wrong.

[retrodynamic]

Million Dollar HHO Challenge Open Submission:

www.geocities.com/gearturbine

[squegee69]

ps, In my lifetime, I have seen science proven wrong.

Amen.

[retrodynamic]

Well Mr. Squegee69.
Looks like you make this nice forum a experience religion.
Thanks.
Carlo Barrera.

[xjet]

With the amount of money you say you are willing to put up, why don't you get a couple of ace mechanics, get a couple of old cars and try it. What is your agenda? If they make that much money to do this, then surely they would just spend very little and do it for themselves. Makes good business sense to me.

Trust me, I wouldn't take on a bet I didn't think I could win.

I've already done tests that conclusively prove that the science is correct and the claims being made by HHO scammers are groundless.

I intend to publish the detail of those tests on the http://interestingprojects.com website shortly but in effect, it showed (as the science predicts) that while the introduction of H2 and O2 (generated from electrolysis) into the intake of an ICE will result in more work being done for a given amount of gasoline consumed, as soon as you ask the ICE to provide the energy needed to perform that electrolysis, the overall system efficiency is *reduced* and indeed becomes negative when compared to an unmodified ICE.

Three tests were conducted three times each, the results averaged and the conclusion was very clear, well outside the margin of error.

Now when I publish these tests, I'm sure that the HHO scammers will simply say "the tests were flawed", "he did it wrong", "it was a deliberate attempt to discredit the technology", etc, etc.

That is why I am challenging the scammers themselves to provide the proof.  This is the only way we can get irrefutable evidence one way or the other.

If all the entrants are on a level playing field, there's no oil-company or government involvement and the results are published publicly for all to see -- there can be no question of impropriety or conspiracy involved if it turns out that the scammers claims are completely disproved and the HHO hoax is exposed.

ps, In my lifetime, I have seen science proven wrong.

Nowhere near as many times as I've seen pseudo-science proved wrong, believe me!