Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Gravity Motor Patent 7/10/08

Started by mondrasek, July 11, 2008, 04:55:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

mondrasek

Won't work in outerspace.  I agree.  It's a gravity motor, right? 

You can make the wheel as big as required to add enough mass switches to overcome the stator "wall".

Also, when you replace the stator magnets with electro magnets that only fire in the optimum possition you eliminate the "wall".

Thanks,

M.

AB Hammer

mondrasek

I myself work with mostly mechanical gravity wheels, I am also helping another person known here as itsblockdog with another gravity/magnet motor. I would have been done with it but I have been very sick of late, and I still have other doctor appointments. So it may take me another week to finish what I have in the works.
With out a dream, there can be no vision.

Alan

shakman

@ mondrasek

Looks cool mate. Good work!

I think the greater the weight you can shift with this relative to the weight of the wheel itself, the greater the torque will be. I could be wrong there but I imagine a wheel shifting 30kgs would outperform one shifting 3kgs.

In figure 8 it appears that the Stator magnet at 12 o'clock moves with the wheel. There is not indication of separation. I assume this is something you missed in your rush. This is something you might want to clear up with the patent office.

If you do have a stationary section around the axle which can hold magnets, ala Archer Quinn's first prototype with the stationary clock face, you would be able to have an inner and outer stator magnet at 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock so that you had a "push-pull" action on the magnets inside the guide tubes. Then you could potentially use two magnets either side of a weight within the guide tube.

I've just illustrated this. I hope I'm not repeating anyone. I started typing this then realised I should really illustrate what I am saying for absolute clarity.

Sorry if I missed any important details. Let me know if I have and I will add them.

Cheers,

shakman

therealrasta

Look to be a good design. I only skimmed through your patent.. What are the sideways v shape magnet blockers made from  and of course they move when the magnets hit them.But how do they move exactly?



edit -- In a large scale running at low RPM. I can see this providing a hell of a lot of torque.

mondrasek

Shakmen,

Great illustration but one big problem:  There can be NO PULLING MAGNETS!  Magnets have magnitudes of power more force than gravity.  Gravity will never overcome the attractive force of a magnet that has attratively captured it's target.  This is the flaw of A. Quinn's and many other designs.

Please remove the attracting magnets.

And thank you for your assistance.

Australia is one of the places on my wife and mine's places to visit.  Hope to meet some day.

M.