Selfrunning Waterpump-generator device runs 60 Watts lamp...

[khabe]

Oh dear! Water pump - water beam = like motor and flywheel - at that - last mentioned has much less losses.
When electric locomotive with many wagons (water beam ;-) - and  wheel of last wagon has connected to electric generator (direct or belt ;-)  - it never produces more energy than motor of locomotive uses to drive all the train. You can add generators to every wheel ... every wagon  - they will decelerate the train with  energy what generators produce + losses + transmission (belt) losses. The only way to go ahead - add/use more ampers. Produced energy could be higher than spent only when way is top-down or when generators used as brakes before depot (regenerative brake).
OU forum is  interisting ... even very! - but only up till it kept away from total foolery. Elementary school was not obligatory where you spent your childhood
khabe

[Omega_0]

Dont forget gravity who add power to the falling water (this is free energy btw)

Did you forget the energy required to lift that water up there in first place ??

(Assuming that by power you mean energy, these two are very different animals )

[khabe]

Perpetual Childhood.

[Omega_0]

Seeing that posting the specs and a scan of modified generator should take only 5 mins, I must say that the inventor is avoiding disclosing this stuff, which is suspicious.

I'm still holding my horses and will remain hopeful.

I'm sure that he very well knows that the patent is already there and no one can misuse the information for unfair commercial gain. He is already protected.
So avoiding independent replicators means only one thing .........

[fritz]

@The guys who know everything:

A train looks somewhat to be a simple thing at first sight.
If you have a high speed train which goes up to 500km/h
the story is quite different - I don?t have to mention hypersonic
trains or - near to lightspeed trains.
An H-Bomb is quite a simple "bang" thing - but they use huge
computer grids for their calculations.
Even a 1N4148 diode looks like a simple thing - if U use it
in an avramenko plug (see Dr. Stifflers experiments) its
somewhat different.
As an engineer u build your applications from "rated" parts.
As long as you read all the data and use the stuff as its
"rated" everything is quite easy.
But there is some reason why there are universities, and
there is some reason why there are scientists.
The world is not simple - we use formulas and theorems to
make it easy understandable - but that works only within
the boundaries of our science.

Connecting such a powerful pump (which is "rated" for a
2x 3inch connection) to a short 1 inch hose is something
the pump was never designed for. Nobody tested it that way
because they were for the rush to high flow.
Maybe there?s a hyperfast water-vortex inside with an air
bubble - we dont know.
We even don?t know whats happening in the generator.

Nobody knows, there is the promise for another video -
I?m interested.

This "u are stupid - we are clever" mindset is maybe a good
feeling on the short run and something which helps polishing
your ego - but a very poor answer to things you
don?t know.

rgds.