Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Linnard?s hydrogen on demand system without electricity !

Started by hartiberlin, October 04, 2005, 06:54:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

ResinRat2

Did some meter readings. I have a fan draw of 0.674 volts at 41.4 mA and I have a regeneration draw of 0.826 volts at 3.44 mA.

So my calculations are as follows:

Fan= (0.674V)(0.0414A)= 0.0279Watts or 27.9mW

Regeneration=(0.826V)(0.00344A)= 0.00284Watts or 2.84mW

27.9mW-2.84mW= 25.06 mW overunity.

25.06mW
-------------   x 100 =  over 89% overunity.
27.9mW

It is difficult to believe it is that high but those are the numbers I have right now. Similar to the 85% overunity I calculated previously.

I am not putting much faith in these numbers right now. They are all mute if the reactor stops running. It needs to keep going and going without stopping. We shall see.

Somebody please correct me if I am wrong here. It is easy to make a mistake when dealing with new research. I can miss things easily as well.

Thanks everyone for your interest.
Research is the only place in a company where you can continually have failures and still keep your job.

I knew immediately that was where I belonged.

ResinRat2

Quote from: ResinRat2 on October 28, 2007, 09:56:40 PM
25.06mW
-------------   x 100 =  over 89% overunity.
27.9mW

It is difficult to believe it is that high but those are the numbers I have right now. Similar to the 85% overunity I calculated previously.

Just realized something else to consider. The external fuel cells are only about 50% efficient at best. If the fuel cell could be built inside the reactor then the efficiency would skyrocket. Probably close to 100%. That would put the overunity number even higher.

This is an encouraging variable to consider. I believe evidence enough to justify scaling up in size. So while this reactor continues to run and I continue to learn how to properly maintain it, I will begin the planning and construction of a much, much larger prototype.

Thanks everyone for your interest.
Research is the only place in a company where you can continually have failures and still keep your job.

I knew immediately that was where I belonged.

NssB

Hey RR,

I'm one of the avid watchers of this thread. And I just thought it about time to make another posting.
Just wanted to say, I have great faith in this whole 'journey', but at the end of the day, if you never reach the ultimate goal of OU......
Save the world, and subsequently sock it to Big Oil.........you have been an inspiration to follow.
Your openess to ideas and you downright persistance is truly awsome and if all you do is motivate the rest of us to get off our arses and do something about the world, then you have already succeeded.

So as a spokesperson for the 'rest of us'........a massive thank you for your efforts so far and so forth.

Cheers
NssB

P.S  - The above goes to everyone who has contributed also, let it not be said :)



ResinRat2

Quote from: NssB on October 29, 2007, 03:11:18 PM
P.S  - The above goes to everyone who has contributed also, let it not be said :)


I think that is the reason it has gotten this far.

I used to write that when I looked DOWN at my young son it inspired me to not quit. Now he is fifteen, going to be driving, and has more height and a lot more hair than me. So when I look UP an my teenage son, it gives me motivation to keep plugging away. I want to prove definitively whether this will or will not work. I want the world freed from these greedy oil barons. I want my son to live in a safer world.

Let the chips fall where the truth says they will.
Research is the only place in a company where you can continually have failures and still keep your job.

I knew immediately that was where I belonged.

hansvonlieven

G'day Dave,

As someone who is following your experiments with keen interest I have a question. Does your reactor generate enough hydrogen to maintain a small flame?

If that is so, have you considered using a small sterling engine or a thermopile instead of the fuel cells to generate your power?

Good luck with your further tests.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx