Antigravity effect based on a principle of counter-rotating magnets

[z.monkey]

Howdy Y'all,

Just received something that can answer a lot of questions for us here in this topic.  This is a copy of "The Vimanika Shastra" from the Vedas.  This is information about the Vimanika (Flying Ships) from ancient India during the Raman Empire.  The Vril and Thule Societies in Germany used this information to build antigravity ships before WWII.  This is a GODsend.  I can't wait to read it.  Just got it from a friend.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item122

OK, Have fun with that...

Blessed Be...

[z.monkey]

Howdy Y'all,

Here are a few more documents.

"Secret Societies" is the story of the German Vril and Thule societies developing antigravity aircraft before and during World War II...

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item132

"Orion Technology" documents a wide variety of secret technologies including but not limited to the Philadelphia Experiment, Project Rainbow, Project Montauk, Phoenix Project, Project Dreamscan, Project Moonscan, Project Mindwrecker, Reichian technology, Aliens and UFOs.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item134

In "The Case for the UFOs" Morris Jessup explores the extensive evidence.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item135

Blessed Be...

[X00013]

@ All, I can't help you on this subject, but maybe this guy can http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gs1yI_UjiE

[gravityblock]

@v71 regarding gravitons:

I think that the observations of lensing indicate that a quantum theory of gravity, based on gravitons interacting with every particle including individual photons, cannot be correct. For graviton interaction to be correct, a photon would have to follow a polygonal path as it passes a massive body, each segment of the polygon being, perhaps, of planck length.

To complicate matters even more, string theory actually predicts the gravitons you are referring to. Kip Thorne explains in his book, Black Holes and Time Warps that the electromagnetic field of an object contributes to the gravity of the object, because mass and energy are equivalent. I believe that gravity is nothing more than a large mass leaking energy in the form of heat, light, radiation, energy from the sun be reflected back into space, and other forms of energy that we may or may not know about leaking into space, which then gets dispersed as an electromagnetic wave outwards from the large mass, which then causes fluctuations in space and in time due to the different energy densities that are traveling outwards from the mass.  Thus the energy density will be stronger in the vicinity of the mass as opposed to further away. The fluctuations in spacetime causes objects to gravitate towards each other due to the different energy densities. A small object will move towards a larger object because it will follow where the energy is the highest. This is nature's way to regain the energy/mass that was lost or leaked.

The range of electromagnetism and gravitational force are both thought to be infinite. The strength or intensity of an electromagnetic field and a gravitational field both decreases at a rate of 1/distance2. The only difference is in its relative strength. The relative strength for gravity is 1 and the relative strength for electromagnetism is 10 with 36 more zeros behind it. The reason why gravity has a lower relative strength (weaker) is because gravity is acting on all matter or the entire energy/mass of an object and not just on electrically charged particles. Thus gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves must be the same. Also, gravitational radiation and electromagnetic radiation must be the same. The reason why string theory predicts the graviton is because it is the same force that is responsible for electromagnetism, thus the gravitons and photons must be the same. So, one may say that gravity is a process and not really a force, although the process does create a force. Reverse the process and you may have anti-gravity. Could it be that the force carrying virtual photons cannot be detected because they are in another dimension?

I don't know if the above is correct, but it does make sense to me and I believe it is inline with GR, SR, and string theory. I have posted the above ideas in another thread, but not sure if the idea is correct or will even be accepted. I will attach a pdf file that I am drawing my ideas from. Please read the pdf file, because it explains it so much better than I can. I am posting this idea because even if it is only partially correct, it could lead to something that is correct. Just a thought.

"The day you stop thinking is the day you die"

[holri]

I can't find the book at the web site you mentioned. Is there a chance you could tell me the title or authors name?