Pros and cons of permanent magnet motors

[Magnetist]

No, every element of what I believe can be proven.  If new evidence came about contradicting my view, and this evidence was validated, I would change my view immediately.

Ok, let's test this. You probably believe in how physics defines kinetic energy. Everybody knows (believes) that Ekin=1/2mv².
Now here is a guy who proves otherwise: http://nov55.com/ener.html
Momentum (m*v) is all there is to energy. Can you refute the proofs on that website. I'd be interested to see your refutation because I can't and none of my physicist aquintances can either.

[TechStuf]

One might wish to obtain 4 ring magnets of the same material, size, strength and design.   Put two in opposition S/S on a pencil, one suspended over the other.  Now do the same with the other two N/N on a different pencil.  Stick both pencils vertically into a styrofoam or cardboard base sufficiently distant as not to interfere with each other.  Notice that both upper magnets hover the same distance over each bottom magnet.

There, one has just shattered the myth of the current magnetic field model as taught in the science halls of 'higher' learning.  The current field model is but one of MANY apparently purposeful misdirections long enshrined in order keep tow of a malignant status quo.



If, after conducting this simple experiment, one still needs to ask why, then ask an elementary school science teacher, or better yet, a physics professor to explain why no force assymetry is evident in the contrary arrangement of the above two examples.

Consider following up with this simple experiment:

http://www.cheniere.org/misc/static%20poynting%20gen.htm

There are numerous ways to demonstrate that the simple dipolar arrangement in a permanent magnet is, in effect, a transducer.  Yes, those virtual photon strings are in fact, energy. Not simply a 'force'.


But don't take my word for it. 


I don't.


TS

[jhewitt03041976@gmail.com]

In response to the magnetic field, some of the largest & fastest rotors and coil combos are in nuclear reactors, using that and smaller examples like backup house generators and alternators for cars, the field remains relative to the source (the magnets) * 3.141% of the total current (Amperage) produced, 100', 100 amps produced = 314' field effect maximum, disruptions of electronics systems would be relative to resonance frequencies, as for biological effects, provided no one has any installed Coclear or heart devices, you should be good with reasonable shielding.

[jhewitt03041976@gmail.com]

The "pros & cons" of a successful magnetically driven overunity device is more complicated than people realize, some pros could be, as the designs of such devices would be so simple usually, creating a patent for them would be difficult, so everybody and his brother would be making off-brand and generic versions cheap, so affordability is a HUGE "pro", many companies will also use the tech to create variations for other purposes, houses, cellphones, cars, ect.....yah, pro, companies will also research to make smaller, more powerful, pro, these can also add some new market jobs, but where there might be a 15% increase in new jobs.....comes the cons

.
with the release of such devices that provide free and/or cheap energy, there will be huge losses in company revenues, power companies, and fossil fuel companies, solar and wind power companies will all go tits up, huge losses of money to investors, huge losses of jobs, not just in the companies themselves, but also all related areas, companies that provide services related to power, including gas stations as well as maintenance and other related, companies that produce parts and equipment, ect., a much bigger loss of jobs than the immediate increase, and the greater loss would happen a lot faster than the much smaller increase, people could be out of work for months and even years, retraining for a new career would also take time and money, LOTS of it, then you get to the political......imagine a country that becomes almost totally self sufficient, wars would break out from those that produce fossil fuels (more so than normal), others thinking/feeling threatened by such superior tech, it would take a long time for lesser developed countries to catch up,
I am more interested in the pros of course, but the cons can't be ignored either, I'm sure I've missed many things, but I was just trying to bring up an expanded view of the "pros & cons"

[TechStuf]

Which is, in part, why the status quo has remained.  (Malignant though it's become over time.)

Don't upset 'the' apple cart.  keep walking along, keep your head down, nothing to see here.

And never mind the smell.  In for a penny, in for a pound, a bunch of rotten apples are what make the cart go round. And btw, the rumors that the whole cart is in jeopardy are greatly unfounded.

Say, kid, grab that wheel over there, help me put it back on....

Gotta keep it movin....

Keep moving forward...

Just keep swimming...

Pay no attention to those satanic pedophiles behind the curtains....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qM6r8KapWIk

Up is down, freedom is tyranny, good is bad, and real is fake and fake is real! 

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is not to be trusted!


Peace and effervescence