Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Infinite battery? The forbidden factor that can make this possible.

Started by Magnethos, September 04, 2008, 12:10:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Magnethos

I have heard that, there is a way to convert a battery into a perpetual battery. The theory is if you draw only Voltage throught an special wire (not copper wire) then you will have a superconductor effect. I'm going to explain it better:

You know that you need watt to make a device work, of course. You need voltage (the key factor) and then you need amperage (that is the speed or force of the electrons). So, you will need more or less amperage depending of the resistance of the conductor material (true?). So, if you have a superconductor wire, the resistance = 0, so you only need some mAmps or maybe no amperage to make a device work. Of course, a superconductor wire is expensive and you have to maintain it perfectly.

Ohm Law says that when you draw energy throught a wire, a current appears immediately. But if you look at the solid physic's there is a factor called 'Relaxation Time'. So, when you draw energy in a wire, the current doesn't appear inmediately there is a previous stage when the voltage is ready and the current must increase from 0 to X.
Why the relaxation time has been ignored? Of course, the relaxation time has been ignored because in copper is a extremely little time, and it's despicable(contemptible) and anyone can't use that technique using copper as conductor material. But if you change copper for other special alloy, the relaxation time could be 1ms. So in this case, we could obtain energy from the new material, because for that fraction of time the wire acts a superconductor and no current is drawed, so no current draw = no discharge. And you can get the desire voltage.

Do you think that we can develop this theory?

Magnethos

So, the key is:
You can obtain a voltage wave from a certain period of time, depending of the conductor material used. When you draw energy in the wire, the voltage 'travels' at the speed of light and the current needs a certain time (variable in each material) to go from 0 to X. If you get the energy before the current starts to increase, you will run a device only with pure voltage/voltage wave. The key is to make an alloy of 2 metals because replicating the effect in copper is hard to do because the Relaxation Time of copper is 0.0000000000000000001 seconds and in the alloy is 0.001 Seconds. So, you can extract the voltage wave from the alloy without any current. That means an infinite battery. Of course, you need to repeat the effect again and again and again.

gyulasun

Do you mean this: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tbfrenrg.htm ?

The theory sounds clever, however no practical implementation.  Why?

Magnethos

thank you man, I haven't seen that website. But I'm reading it and the theory seems to be almost the same.
I didn't posted the link where I read the info because the website is in spanish.

PS: I have read more and I think that is the same theory. The 2 metals are iron and aluminum. In the website that I read don't explain the exact proportion, in your website says 98% Aluminun 2% Iron.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE LINK!!!

Magnethos

Quote from: gyulasun on September 04, 2008, 05:10:59 PM
Do you mean this: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tbfrenrg.htm ?

The theory sounds clever, however no practical implementation.  Why?

No practical implementation? What do you want to say? Do you mean that we don't see that device replacing the oil? Or what?