Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Tesla Radiant Energy Collector TREC.

Started by clone477, September 10, 2008, 10:23:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

clone477

I see there is alot of dicussion on this subject.  Ive been a member of "onesmallstepforman" yahoo group with Lawrence Rayburn as the creator of the TREC.  Alot of details have been given out as to the theory of operation.  It has to do with the Tank Circuit of multiple nested inductors.  Primary inductors are usually Single wound, secondaries are Bifilar WITH one larger diameter wire than the other(in the bifilar)  Then The bifilar is fedback to the primary of the next set.  This is regenerative feedback circuit which Tesla talks about and experimented with in the Colorado Spring notes.  He said in those notes that this feedback circuit causes signal that are normally to "feeble" to become stronge enough to do work and power motors,ect.  Thsi is the basics of the TREC.  The whole tuner is tunable by moving the inductors one within the other as they are all build on different diameter tubes, this adjusts the amount of transformer action, the mutual inductance, and inter-capacitance fo the bifilars.  Anyways this gives you a lead point, Join the group and you will learn more, I have.  Fern

Koen1


demirevs

This is what Lawrence Rayurn says:

The Tesla Radiant Energy Collector, my version, does not produce
free energy. Sure, by your definition, it is overunity because it
requires no input of energy to make it self start. God's creation
supplies that and the TREC only redirects a small stream of the
energy that is already there and flowing.

Koen1

Yes, of course, considering that we live in a vast sea of energy,
there is always some energy flowing somewhere, and it is conceivable that
some of that may be redirected.
And so, in that light, "free energy" as such is a meaningless term, and what
most of us call "free energy" would always be redirected components of the
continual energy flow through the cosmos. And so technically it is not "free
energy" nor "over unity" as the supersystem that is the cosmos already
contains and circulates the energies, so in that view there is never "over unity"
nor "free energy".

Nevertheless, when we are looking at electrical devices we generally do not
include the rest of the universe in its entirety in our calculations of energy efficiency
of the device.
If we have a device that does not need input energy fed to it by us, the users of the device,
while the device does produce output energy in a form that we can readily use,
then our efficiency calculations for the device and its input-output ratio will show that
we have a device which produces a lot more usable output than it takes input,
and that it is hyperefficient. The energy it produces may come from the universal
sea of energy somehow, but that does not change the fact that for all intents and purposes
we as earthbound humans can come up with in daily life, we have output energy that
does not require an equal amount of input energy, and so effectively it seems to be "free".
Obviously, there must be some form of exchange in the multidimensional manifold that
we in its plane we inhabit tend to call the universe, but that does not make the output
less real.

So when I ask "Is it OU?", I am asking
"does it produce significantly more output energy in usable form, than it takes
input energy fed to it by the operator?".

The answer appears to be "Yes"...

Which makes the next question:
"Ok, so please tell us how we can build one?" ;D

sparks

@Koen1


    In the final analysis we are looking for free work!

@all

        Tesla said many times that the Earth was negatively charged.  Negative compared to what?  Say we get a bunch of ionized gas that have the electrons stripped away and put them in a bottle .  So now we have a positive plate.  What happens in the zone between the earth and the positive plate.  Voltage drop.  Now if we insert two plates into this zone the voltage drop is now expressed on the two new plates differentially.
Does this discharge the Earth?  Does it stop the positive ions from being ionized?
Now the two new plates form a capacitor which is charged with radiant energy and discharged into a motor like the one he popped into his Pierce Arrow.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love