Military Helicopter over WTC (from 911eyewitness)

[hartiberlin]

Ironically, that sort of argument does not fly here when used to argue against the possibility "free energy" or "overunity" devices.

We are speaking here just of the ffect of gravity nothing else
and it did not modify gravity !
So your argument does not count.

It didn't literally fall into its own footprint.  Look at the pictures on that debunking site and you will find the debris pile. 

This was a skyscraper of about 30 flooors or higher..
What do you expect ?
ALso with controlled demolition there would be debris a hundred meters around..
This is also no argument.

Nevertheless, how would you expect it to fall?  Do you expect it would tip completely over before disintegrating?

Yes, as it was said and as you can see in yourquoted video,
the building was only burning at one side more or less..

If that would have caused  a collapse ( which it did not)
it would have tipped over or at least one part would
have remained and it would have fallen completely different...!

What is a "pyroclusting cloud"?

You have not seen all the videos from Steven Jones, Eric Huffschmidt, etc,
otherwise you would know, that this means the heated dustcloud from
explosive detonation.
Many?  What percentage?

How many times have 767's loaded with jet fuel crashed into skyscrapers?  Obviously no airplanes hit WTC7, but the collapse of the two towers earlier affected the firefighters' ability to deal with the fire in WTC7 effectively.  Note that in this video:  http://www.youtube.com/v/Afb7eUHr64U  the person speaking (presumably a firefighter) is concerned that the building could collapse, based on the damage and uncontrolled fire.  (Listen at about the 1:30 mark)  The collapse was not a huge surprise to this person, anyway.

I only understand, from the audio:

"There is a hole in the building..
scrammble.
..is coming down.."

Maybe he said windows or glas or stones are coming down-...


It looks pretty intact the building,only a few fires on some floors
but surely not so hot to melt the steel frame and weaken the whole
building.

The facts are:
1.Pyroclusting clouds and footprint tell us that it was a controlled demolition.
2. Demolition experts agree.
3. Fires never have brought down steel buildings burning much longer.
( See Loose change movie, where you can see a different Skyskraper burn
for 18 hours or so in many floors with hot yellow flames and it did not collapse)
4. Explosive squibs can be seen on the videos on WTC7.
5.Nobody never came forward with any other logical explanation
how WTC7 was "pulled".


I guess this is enough now.

Topic closed.