Stanley Meyer and The Water Car Hoax

[allcanadian]

@heairbear
Bill Beaty has an excellent site and I have been visiting it for years, I really like this quote in the link you posted.

N. Tesla (brushless AC motor)
An AC motor which lacks brushes was thought to be an instance of a Perpetual Motion Machine.

I have done extensive research into the history of the AC motor and found it disturbing that both the scientific and engineering communities could act in such an disgraceful manner towards AC technologies at the time .I think many professionals today see new technologies as a threat, and in some ways it does question there intellect. As if to say --- if you are so smart why didn't you see this new technolgy coming? and why do you not understand it? It would be a huge blow to there ego's since most of them are egomaniacs to begin with.LOL

[professor]

Hi Allcanadian
Just ignore him, he has been doing the same mindless thing to me on other posts.
He is a useless troll.
On the Stanley Meyer subject, has anyone looked at this Website and in particular the Stack?
Interesting! I am constructing mine the same way for a  good reason.
professor

@wizardofmarsLOL, you are one funny character, when you speak of pseudoscience you should first understand what "science" is. Science is the pusuit of fact through experiment, this could also include debate of the issues including very abstract issues which to the layman may seem a little left field. This forum fits that criteria very well as both debate and experiment occur, as for the subject matter in any science that is irrelevant.Here is the definition---- Then you quote an ultimate lack of success as proof, as proof of what? I have colleagues in the field of engineering who have been working over 20 years on one single project, the physics say there project will work but a bunch of calculations on some papers is not reality, in reality developing new technology takes a great deal of time and effort, something I am guessing you know nothing about. Maybe you should get your facts straight before posting to avoid this nonsense in the future

[wizardofmars]

Then you quote an ultimate lack of success as proof, as proof of what? I have colleagues in the field of engineering who have been working over 20 years on one single project, the physics say there project will work but a bunch of calculations on some papers is not reality, in reality developing new technology takes a great deal of time and effort, something I am guessing you know nothing about.

The difference in this case is that all of these backyard inventors hyped their technologies, roped in investors and then they are somehow 'lost' before they are made available. It's always the same pattern whether it is Dennis Lee, Steorn, Archer Quinn or whoever - it goes back centuries to Bessler. Nobody is ever able to recreate their experiments or technology.

Real science doesn't work that way. Even people working on projects for years find there are others working in parallel. The whole 'perpetual motion' field hasn't had a single workable breakthrough ever!

[newbie123]

wizardofmars,

No doubt that some inventors have made up elaborate suppression stories to defend their work/scams.     But chances are some are true as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_suppression
http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Suppression

[professor]

I added the link that was missed in my previous post
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Water_Fueled_Car_-_Sri_Lanka

Hi Allcanadian
Just ignore him, he has been doing the same mindless thing to me on other posts.
He is a useless troll.
On the Stanley Meyer subject, has anyone looked at this Website and in particular the Stack?
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Water_Fueled_Car_-_Sri_Lanka
Interesting! I am constructing mine the same way for a  good reason.
professor