Burning water video

[mindsweeper]

Here is the allocated radio spectrum for the USA, looks like the 13.56 MHz is allocated to aeronautical radionavigation & Mobile

The link to the spectrum is here http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf

[BEP]

Jeez.....

That exact frequency is also one of the many ISM allocations. Please note ISM allocations tend to be harmonics of other ISM allocations.

[professor]

Prof

You talk about modulating the frequency to that of waters resonant frequency - what do you think this is? 

I ask as I feel pretty sure that it would be much greater than 13.56MHz - I presumed that's what microwave ovens did at 2.4GHz

Not sure what you mean by this:

As obviously it is chlorine ions in the water that provides chlorine gas in standard electrolysis, not sodium.

I'm a little in the dark with your reference to the Rife Device as I've never heard of it or of Rifes work, but I would think this is very different to using nano particles like Kanzius was.  If you are familiar with an induction furnace, you will know that what Kanzius was doing with the metallic nano particles makes perfect sense and would seem a lot less complicated than trying to find a specific resonant frequency of a cancerous cell.

I just wish that there was an electrochemist out there somewhere that might be able to shed some light on the electrochemical reaction.  I've not even heard any theories as to the reaction/s taking place.

Hi,

Google production of Chlorine may be you find your Answer.

If you have been around this forum reading the HH2O threads you would have heard about resonant frequencies of water.
There are a few claims but all of them are in the Ultrasonic range. Microwave produces steam just try and light a cup of boiling water in a microwave you'll find out .....it does nothing.
Keely and you can Google all of this as well as I can, said it was somewhere at 42.800 Khz  clearly ultrasonic.
As I said I will not rehash what is commonly known by most. http://amasci.com/freenrg/h2oblast.html

I am quite clear as to what Kanzius did and I am  very familiar with his method.
Just Google "Rife" and  and you will have your answer as to why I compared both People that in a  different yet  similar Way destroyed Cancer.
You need to do some reading and research before assuming certain things and only then  should you be looking for answers to Questions that you do not understand.
Please do your research or you will be waisting Bandwidth your time and everybody else's time.
No bashing intended.
professor

[Farrah Day]

With all due respect Prof, I do find your last post typical of the arrogance of many on these forums.

People like you seem to think you know it all, while others, like me, as you put it 'need to do some reading and research'. Comments like that get my back up right away - you have no idea of who I am or what my background education is, let alone what I know or don't know.

There has only ever been claims of people dissociating water in the ultrasonic range, largely due to these being frequencies claimed by Meyer and that link you posted - I've yet to see it actually substantiated. I've heard all the talk Prof, but that's all it seems to be... just talk.

To the best of my knowledge only Kanzius has ever done this on the record - or anything like this.

Most Meyer type units using ultrasonic pulsing are still effectively standard electrolysers pulsing dc, and still relying on current flow and the exchange of charges on the electrodes. And many people in their naivety simply use dc pulsing as a way of controlling the gas output, while never actually achieving anything like a useable amount of gas in the first place!

The resonant frequency of the water molecule is far greater than ultrasonic frequencies, but this is quite irrelevant in that we are never talking about a single water molecule.  Furthermore there can be no magical resonant frequency to dissociate water as water molecules cluster together. Hence, the overall mass of any given body of water would require a different frequency to resonate.

If what happened in that test tube was related to a resonant ultrasonic frequency, then it would also be related to the mass of water within the tube, so the frequency to achieve that result would be different for any given amount of water. However, I doubt any reputable experimentor would have been quite so quick to dismantle his apparatus and forget the whole thing. Such a discovery would surely have encouraged further research. 

Have you ever ignited the resulting mist of an ultrasonic mister? Did it burn?

Anyway you're right about one thing, I'm clearly wasting bandwidth and more importantly my time here, so I'll leave you to it.

No bashing intended!

[aussepom]

Hi Farrah Day

         Well I am with you on this, and 42.8khz, is not ultra sonic, microwave oven uses sonic sound wave, produced in a cavity.
I will stop here I may be wasting  bandwidth and time.
aussepom