Faraday's Paradox experiment

[allcanadian]

@Gravityblock
I will post a video of how I believe the experiment must be performed as I had outlined prior then when there is no rotation the people here can decide for themselves who really knows what and what the real facts of this matter are.
Regards
AC

[gravityblock]

@Gravityblock
Here is what I did, I placed a magnet in a sealed chamber which was laser levelled with the ground plane of the earth. This magnet was "Levitated" so that it was now one inch from the non-magnetic walls of the chamber in all directions with no frictional forces of any kind, it was free floating in a sealed space. Next I placed another magnet below it on precision bearings which was laser levelled on all axis with the magnet in the chamber and the apparatus was monitored for stability. Then the lower magnet was rotated and there was a slight rotation but if the distance was increased the rotation decreased as the field became more uniform. It should be obvious that a free floating magnet must rotate under any force no matter how small and it was found that the fields could still interact or have an attraction but not effect the other by causing a rotation. I also found in every case that if the lower magnet was tilted off angle by even 1/100 of a degree that the magnet in the chamber would rotate due to differences in the internal material density(mass). This material density translates into a change in field density which can be measured by properly biased hall effect sensor arrays, this differential field density will cause rotation. In fact I could stand four feet away from the apparatus with a magnet in my hand and tilt the magnet in the chamber which resulted in a slight rotation due to the magnets internal imbalance. I will concede I could be wrong and I think we all should do the same however I have done more than a few time consuming and costly experiments which have given me certain facts that tell me the magnetic field does not rotate, that is my opinion.
Regards
AC

Even in allcanadian's perfect experiment, a rotation was observed.  He attributes this to non-uniformities.  Like I said before, if the non-uniformities are rotating, then so are the portions which are uniform. To think otherwise is total nonsense.  An actual change in density allows one to see that the field is rotating.

GB

[gravityblock]

@Gravityblock
I will post a video of how I believe the experiment must be performed as I had outlined prior then when there is no rotation the people here can decide for themselves who really knows what and what the real facts of this matter are.
Regards
AC

You have already said there was rotation in your experiment, and this rotation decreased as the distance between the magnets is increased.  Now your going to take a video showing no rotation at further distances. LOL

I can feel a small tension between two magnets in my experiments when trying to gently and slowly rotate one.  Another person even confirmed this.  Of course this tension is going to decrease as the distance between the magnets are increased.

GB

[allcanadian]

@Gravityblock

You have already said there was rotation in your experiment, and this rotation decreased as the distance between the magnets is increased.  Now your going to take a video showing no rotation at further distances. LOL

I can feel a small tension between two magnets in my experiments when trying to gently and slowly rotate one.  Another person even confirmed this.  Of course this tension is going to decrease as the distance between the magnets are increased.

Everyone will have the facts soon enough and I am sorry to say you will not be pleased with my results.
AC

[gravityblock]

@Gravityblock
Everyone will have the facts soon enough and I am sorry to say you will not be pleased with my results.
AC

I'm interested in the truth, whatever that may be.  I do have concerns of you fudging the results, since you have already stated there was rotation in your previous experiment and this new similiar experiment you're predicting no rotation.  That doesn't add up in my book. 

Anyways, let's assume for the moment there is no rotation. A magnet not being induced to rotate by another magnet doesn't prove the field remains stationary.  The field of the second magnet could always change the results, such as a cancellation of forces leading to no net rotation or cause the field of the stationary magnet to detach while the field of the rotating magnet stays firmly seated on the magnet, similiar to the double-slit experiment when any modification of the apparatus that can determine which slit a photon passes through destroys the interference pattern and changes the experimental results.

Can you also do the experiment with opposing magnets to rule out any cancellations leading to no net rotation between two magnets in attraction mode?  This is the proper way to perform the experiments, and I think you will agree.  If you are successful in showing there is no rotation, then I hope you are prepared in proving the experiment itself isn't a factor in the results. I have a number of other concerns as well, which would need to be ruled out also. Don't half-ass your experiments like I did.

[Edit:]  After more thought, I'm not sure if the opposing magnet experiment is a good test to determine if there is a cancellation of forces or not, resulting in no net rotation.

GB