Faraday's Paradox experiment

[sm0ky2]

the magnetic field exists on an atomic level. and this is where induction begins.

the copper too, has a field of its own. be-it however small we cannot detect it by normal means.

when this turns through the magnetic field, it encounters resistance. This is the same effect that causes two magnets to repel. But in this scase, on the tiny tiny scale, it is the atomic forces battling it out, which manifests itself as an electrical phenomenon. the greater the motion, the greater the countering electrical manifestation.

The relationship between the mass of the copper, the force*distance of motion, the electricity produced, and the strength of the magnetic field can be used to derrive the any of the four values, if given the other three.
This is very important.

What is also important, is that when you set up a magnetic-beam, and have a shielded-oscillator, such that it periodically projects a change in flux onto a piece of metal, inside a magnetic field: it heats the metal, corresponding precisely to the strength*area of the affected field and the frequency of change.

Its all part of a much larger puzzle, which all ties back to the categorial subject matter of this thread. The Aether.


p.s. if your mind is now going in circles inside your head, just slap yourself in the face a few times, that usually works......

[sm0ky2]

... And then to acknowledge that if anything moved at greater than light speed - how on earth or in heaven - would we ever find it?  It would stay dark. 

Then you'll see there's a whole lot of paradoxes that become immediately explicable.  That's my argument.  Maybe - one day - I'll persuade you to dip in and look at the thesis here Sm0ky.  I'd be very glad of your input.

Kindest regards,
Rosie
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35909676/REVISION-OF-DARK-MATTER-MFM

edited

Thats probably gonna take a little more persuading... i only made it to page 12, when you started talking about the zippon rings.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

the magnetic field exists on an atomic level. and this is where induction begins.

Where?  It is known that an atom may be imbalanced due to sundry valence conditions - but there is no KNOWN magnetic field in an atom.  It is only KNOWN to have magnetic type properties.

the copper too, has a field of its own. be-it however small we cannot detect it by normal means.

If it cannot be detected then the ASSUMPTION is made that copper also has a magnetic field - however large or small. 

when this turns through the magnetic field, it encounters resistance. This is the same effect that causes two magnets to repel. But in this scase, on the tiny tiny scale, it is the atomic forces battling it out, which manifests itself as an electrical phenomenon. the greater the motion, the greater the countering electrical manifestation.

Again - these observations are based on hypothesis.  Why not consider Leedskalnin's hypothesis.  He seemingly was moving 'something' to lighten the loads of those rocks, one assumes.  And I very much doubt he managed to change that granite to something back to granite.  It takes enormous energy to change the material properties of an atom.  But it doesn't take much to change the nature of bound material.  Look at what Hutchinson does to vary the cyrstalline structures of aluminium - or for that matter what he does to levitate various unmagnetisable objects.  But he certainly is not changing those atoms.  Only their distribution in space. 

The relationship between the mass of the copper, the force*distance of motion, the electricity produced, and the strength of the magnetic field can be used to derrive the any of the four values, if given the other three.
This is very important.

I agree with this.  It is always dependent on the material of the atoms themselves.  But if the 'binding' of these atoms were the result of an extraneous field - then the atoms' position in space could be varied without changing the property of that atoms themselves.  You see this perhaps?

What is also important, is that when you set up a magnetic-beam, and have a shielded-oscillator, such that it periodically projects a change in flux onto a piece of metal, inside a magnetic field: it heats the metal, corresponding precisely to the strength*area of the affected field and the frequency of change.

That would be consistent with all energy equations.  I have no quarrels with this.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with the measurements of the forces - all forces - on mass.  If e=mc^2 then the more mass there is the more energy that it would hold.

Its all part of a much larger puzzle, which all ties back to the categorial subject matter of this thread. The Aether.

I entirely agree.

p.s. if your mind is now going in circles inside your head, just slap yourself in the face a few times, that usually works.....

It's always going around in circles.  And if I had to slap myself every time - by now I'd just be more bruises than person.  LOL

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Thats probably gonna take a little more persuading... i only made it to page 12, when you started talking about the zippon rings.

Then hopefully the videos will make this clearer.  I've heard many such complaints.  And they're valid.  LOL.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

   If you take a coil and place it inside a conducting sphere when you energise the coil a magnetic field will be produced that is very consistent with the Earths magnetic field.   You can detect all sorts of magnetic poles produced by eddy currents in the sphere.  Free electrons will drift around magnetic field lines.  When you change the magnetic field line configuration they will try to drift around the magnetic field line they are tethered to.  Its like you are swinging a ball on the end of a rope.  When you walk east the electron rotation moves east with you.  The electron magnetic field tethers it to permeating magnetic field lines.  When the magnetic field lines shift you get electron movement.  Notice these are magnetic field lines.  In between the magnetic field lines there is still some sort of magnetic something.  Magnetic field lines appear at least to me like the isobars on a weather map.  This leads me to believe that the aether is comprised of a magnetic fluid.  Through this magnetic fluid any movements of matter are transmitted.  It is very evident there is inertia at play when we energise a coil of high self induction.   Nothing happens.  There is a phase shift between when we expect the current to flow and when it does.  Like the magnetic fluid didnt want to move and then when it did it kept moving.

Hi Sparky.  I missed this.  Very well said.  I entirely agree with all that you've written here.  And really well put.  I rather envy you your clarity of expression.  I get way too convoluted.