A machine to convert gravity to mechanical energy # 2

[TinselKoala]

Mr. Koala,
The problem is you are not criticizing my invention. You post junk inventions and use them as a argument to prove my invention won’t work. Than you try to give me a lesson on buoyancy. Still not criticizing my invention. Than you try to give me a lesson on a  closed gravity field, and still don’t criticize my invention.
Be bold criticize my invention, and spot posting stuff that does not have anything to do with my invention.

Yes, I am and have been criticizing your invention. I have posted pictures and links of "junk" inventions to show you that your "invention" has been invented many times before, and didn't work then either. I have given you links to Simanek's website where exact mathematical analyses of buoyancy drives identical and similar to yours are given in detail.
I have tried to explain buoyancy to you, even to the point of making 2 illustrative videos. You refuse to understand the explanations or see how they apply to your device. But apparently everyone else does.
I have pointed out to you that buoyancy is just an effect of gravity, and since gravity is conservative, your device, which is a buoyancy drive and depends on "gravity" as its only source of energy, will not work.

How does all of this not have to do with your invention?
How is it not criticizing your invention?
Is English not your first language?

Not only that, but Mondrasek has been trying to explain another fundamental flaw in your reasoning, having to do with the acceleration. You also refuse to believe his analysis, which is so simple and obvious.

You also made an incredible logical error when you said that, since no one criticized your idea, it must be workable.

But you don't have to believe me. Or even Mondrasek.

Just go build your own model. It's pretty simple, right? You could probably get a high-school science student to build it for her science fair.

Build it.

PROVE ME WRONG.

Or, even, address the points made in Simanek's work on buoyancy, and tell us why he and his colleagues are wrong.

[blueroomelectronics]

I am still waiting for someone to explain what phase of my machine won't work?
All I get are reasons other machines won't work.

It's the burden of the inventor to prove the invention works... I've read many of your posts and inventions, are they some kind of joke? The Hurricane destroyer his hilarious, do you actually know how large a hurricane is? And the gravity stuff, where did you go to school? Did you graduate?

[blueroomelectronics]

Grayone,
I don’t ignore the answers, the problem is I don’t understand them.

Another good example of why school is important.

[brian334]

I just went to the Symantec website, those machines are junk. Even a fifth grader could explain why they won’t work. Can you explain why my machine won’t work? It should be easy for a intelligent man like your self.

[TinselKoala]

That's Simanek, not Symantec.

Perhaps you could now take Simanek's analysis, point by point, and explain how your device is not similar to those shown and analyzed by him.

And I have already explained, several times and in several ways, why and how your machine cannot work.

If you do not understand or believe my explanations, that's fine. But it won't make them go away, as you seem to wish.

Now, go to your hobby shop, buy some parts, and PROVE ME WRONG.

It should be easy for an intelligent man like yourself.