Isn't free communication as important as free energy?

[Magnethos]

@excomm0n
Sorry for the late reply. I'm involved in other projects and I had to write a computer program because they are asking me about the code, but the main code is now written and I have only to add some features, the big work is done. Also, I'm developing and building a new device to use with that program.

I have almost finished reading the book 'Scalar Wave Transponder' (70 pages book). In the books, Konstantin Meyl shows the problems of common physics and explains in a very good way, the similitudes and difference of the most known theories about electricity, magnetims and electromagnetims. He talks about Maxwell, Faraday, Lorentz and Laplace and how their laws are not universal, because 'schoolbooks scientists' apply their laws as universal laws and that is not true. Some Maxwell, Faraday, Lorentz and Laplace theories are laws are correct, other incorrect, other incomplete and other specific laws for special cases. He resolves this problem comparing the laws and theories and extracting the common points and applying new theories and finding a field-theoretical approach with the equations of transformation, which in its dual formulation is clearly distinguished from the common approaches. And how common physics ignore some critical factors like magnetic monopole. I have to finnish read the book to obtain a clearly idea.

I'm going to finish the book, and I will start reading the bigger one.



My conclusion of what I have read until now is the magnetic field is a vortex field, and the eddy currents produce heat losses depending on the specific electric conductivity, and all this is caused by the Vortex decay. Of course, this is more related with electrican stuff. I have to read more to get an idea about communications stuff.

From what I've been reading it's the antenna type and shape that influences the broadcast type and makes the JNL transmitter directional (as you say above).

Yes, the shape is a critical factor in this experiment. Maybe we could perform some experiments using a ball and covering it with alluminum foil?
About the quartz, I don't know much about it. I know quartz is used for other kinds of communication, and it's transparent to UV Radiation (I don't know if it's transparent also to other kinds of radiation)

PS: The company hasn't reply to me yet.

@not_A_mib
I haven't understood enough about the avian carrier. Are you refering to send information throught birds or what? I don't understood nothing, haha

@Les Banki/exxcomm0n
Welcome, I will look in the website www.globalscalingtheory.com to read the info.
I have just read about the theory and as exx said, it shares a lot with scalar waves theory and about the link you posted (http://www.evert.de/ap0207e.htm), the scalar waves are also called Electrogravitational waves, so the theory seems to be similar. I also read somewhere that Scalar Waves are infinite harmonic (¿?), I can look for the specific info if you want to read more about harmonics and scalar waves.

Yes, scalar wave theory is very similar to other theories. In the project I'm researching now (other project about communications too) the theories I read compared with SW theory... are very similar!

I can't study the JLN schematic because I have no idea about electronics :S
But use 0.5 to 50 Watt. If you use more power it could be dangerous to your health. Remember that scalar waves can induce disseases in people or cure it, depending the frequency you use. So, use 50 Watt as the maximum power.


@HeairBear
Thanks for the schematic!

[allcanadian]

I think the more important issue is to seek understanding of what we have and what is needed. An analogy I would make is that EM waves like the kind we send from our transmitters amounts to moving a paddle back and forth in the water---we are creating a regional distubance(waves) propogating outwards on the surface. We should understand this technique must move the media in the form of waves in order for the disturbance to propogate outward and the power of these waves decreases following the inverse square law. A better way would simply be to smack the surface of the water and create sound waves(unidirectional waves) in the media, you can hear a paddle smack the water---when underwater---from a mile away. We are not moving the media we are producing a pressure wave within the media not having the speed limitations of the media.
The answer is simple----start asking the right questions-----what IS the media, the media is charge carriers immersed in an insulating fluid oscillating at the frequency of every know form of radiation we know of and then some. If you want a global transmitter system that has none of the limitations present in conventional systems then you need to procuce unidirectional oscillations in the terrahetz range. Tesla's currents of high frequency and potential, the media is capacitive in nature, we need high potential to disturb the media and high frequency to reduce losses.
Regards
AC

[exxcomm0n]

@ AC

Thanks for stopping by.

I think you're right about the media as some of what I've been able to find in theory that is the same is that the scalar antenna is "pumping" a wave into the earth that is an "already full container" that will seek an outlet (receiver) to maintain the equilibrium (spill out of).

To use your analogy, the paddle waving back and forth in the water realizes motive "work", but is highly ineffectual as a transmission method because its work production makes counter-productive eddy currents as a natural consequence manifesting in heat?
"Smacking the paddle" will instead create transmission that realizes much more distance and clarity omni-directionally (like a sound wave in water, instead of air) by having a denser (I can think of no other way to describe it) media to travel through so the wave travels faster and with less signal loss?
It's still getting transmitted like sound does (oscillating [bumping] the media)creating a pressure wave, but the media is of a "denser" type (helping its capacitive nature) that transmits with less losses (like water vs. air for sound)?

Sorry for all the questions.

The "terahertz range" and "unidirectional oscillations" is something I have no idea how to even conceive of realizing in hardware (I would think of an air quenched motorized spark gap for frequency range as an example of my understanding of electronics ).

Your insights are welcome though.
Please keep stopping by.

@ All

As I trawl (look) for the documentation I find (only looking for scalar and radio) I find that HAMs are the ones that have been fiddling w/ this type of transmission technology as evidenced here:

http://www.gnucash.org/mirrors/www.amasci.com/freenrg/regen.txt
(radio theory that seems to refine the JNL radio for actual frequency modulated communication.)

and here:

http://www.itcbridge.com/forum/view_topic.php?id=316&forum_id=9
(actual ground antenna testing)

They seem to be talking about regular radio broadcast and reception.

Something the theory page showed me is to Google "Dea/Faretto" for more information about scalar waves with a shielded receiver and a Bedini variant of it.

I'm focused on the antenna right now as it's the easiest and lowest tech part of the theory to explore and I'm still wading through Tesla's patent.

[Magnethos]

@excomm0n
In the book, you can read how to build one transmitter.

[exxcomm0n]

@ Magnethos

I'm just looking at all the examples and trying to find the easiest one, but I suppose I should start with the JNL one as it's the schematic that everyone has available to them.

I just like looking at the schematics and trying to see where the effects they create are in the circuit so I can have a better understanding of HOW it's happening (if it does).

I'm reading the 600+ document too, but it'll take me a while.