HHO Cell - Stan Meyer Design.

[peterpierre]

Yes we shall my boy standing there all proud with his shiny new cell. I have been at this game for a long time. Here are a few things that I stopped believing in half a century ago:

1. Santa Claus.
2, The Tooth fairy.
3. Orgone energy.

That is what happens through life experience, you replace beliefs with knowledge. Well, most people anyway.

I'll check back in 2 -3 months. It sure does take you a long time to test your cell.

Sounds like somebody is bitter about something ....

[Grumpy]

In any event, until we see a working replication of Meyer's device - theories are like orifices - everyone has one.

[peterpierre]

LOL!

Orgone is no different than "scalar fields" or "potentials" or "radiant electricity" or "dielectric flux" or "displacement current" - just another term for somthing that is not understood.

"Spooks" always disregard these things as well.

People disregarded Walter Russell too, until he produced flourine.

In any event, until we see a working replication of Meyer's device - theories are like orifices - everyone has one.

I am sorry ... I am afraid you miscalculated ... each of us has more than one ... err ... orifice ... LOL

[Grumpy]

I am sorry ... I am afraid you miscalculated ... each of us has more than one ... err ... orifice ... LOL

You are correct.  I should have specified "which" orifice.

[peterpierre]

Hm, I was never of the opinion that you were "full of crap" nor can anyone make me believe that you or anybody else is ... you see I am the kind of guy that is used to make up his own mind. If I were to go by what people are saying or hinting on I would wind up in Australia with my head shoved up my ass ... hm ... or was it in the sand? LOL - Either way I know of this document and I have never ignored it, actually that is part of my implementation anyways, I am really good at actually listening to people when they talk so as I watched the two "sessions" that were caught on video of Stan Meyer making a presentation I was not only watching them - I actually did absorb every single bit of info I could get out of it and then after that I put the bits and pieces back together and it all actually makes perfectly sense ... he is very right by applying the K.I.S.S. rule - Keep it simple stupid and simple it is if you open your mind and ears. He was a very smart man, especially with the way he split up the patent in like 40 small patents and selectively dropping one or the other detail out of some of them and I do not blame him but unfortunately it did not keep him alive either so I guess I will try the opposite and apply a "brute force" approach at full speed, the worst that might happen to me would be the same that happened to the late Stanley Meyer but that is all to be seen now isn't it? So perhaps maybe I seem a bit off the wall too to some of you but how far off the wall I really am we are all gonna see as I had mentioned before - but I will also not let anybody tell me or decide for me what will or what will not work - the main reason why inventions these days either never happen and/or go to hell is because there are always others messing with the thought process of the inventor thereby messing up his train of thought/creative flux. But I do thank everyone for encouragement and constructive criticism - in general productive suggestions, I do NOT need people telling me that something will not work or how I should be doing my research and testing - and I will selectively listen or discard what i get to hear / read. Because I really want this finished off so I can move to something else that has also always interested me Thanks guys