Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



4 Mhz Solid State Radiant Battery Charger

Started by callanan, November 07, 2008, 06:49:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

AbbaRue

@drstiffler

Perhaps if you replace the final output inductor with a transformer of the right inductance you can isolate
the output from the circuit to keep it oscillating.
And then draw the output current from the other side of the transformer.
I have been testing different circuit concepts using the following circuit simulator applet, and found that
using a transformer sometimes solves this very type of problem.

http://www.falstad.com/circuit/ 

The load on the other side of the transformer doesn't have the same effect on the rest of the circuit as a direct connection does.
I don't have a copy of the latest SEC built yet so I can't do any testing.


Artic_Knight

im looking at this curcuit as a simple desulfator circuit. The 2 battery set up is doable and looks like it would work (i have not tested yet) however a one battery solution would be better, perhaps we could work out how to add a part to the following diagram in the red circle to block undesired flow? or maybe the circuit needs to be largely redone? the way i see it we need to block spikes or sudden changes in power yet allow steady constant or semi constant flow from the battery. the issue is that there is not only a large spike to worry about but many smaller spikes and we want to keep them forced through the battery which a suitable return path is allso needed. a simple diode could provide the return path at a cost of another .7v which seems like a waste. another inductor at the red circle may direct the large pulse through the battery but there will be some losses. any suggestions?

imagin a bedini style charger that uses one battery only!

lancerdoom

i have designed the same circuit as shown in attachment, working good, but i want to upgrade it to the next level, i have 10 batteries 150 Ah per battery.
i did a little alternation (below) to the circuit can it work? if not then please guide me how to gain more power.



or

http://s15.postimage.org/qq3m8bcy3/With_Coils2_01_01.jpg


poynt99

The dual version should work lancerdoom, but I would recommend you change the diodes to 1N4007's or something with even higher breakdown voltage. The 1N4007 breakdown voltage is 1000V.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Rosemary Ainslie

Golly Poynty,

Are you in the race for Stephan's prize too?  Seems a bit odd.    :o And why aren't you alerting these brave souls to the existence of your own prize?  I believe you've more or less thrashed out the terms by now?  Your hands on involvement here seems somewhat inappropriate if it means you get the first working demonstration and walk off with both your prize and Stephan's.

Regards,
R