The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

[captainpecan]

@ Yucca

Last comment was not meant for you... It just landed right after your post... I have heard your disagreements, and if I remember correctly, they were respectable to say the least.  People seem to think I'm ignoring every negative comment. That is not true, some are well warranted, and those I am working on.  I am definitely picking up some tips to use.  It's just to bad people dont seem to have the tact to offer a disagreement in a way that is not demeaning and disrespectful.

[turbo]

The fatal flaws have all been revealed in earlier posts by Poynt99, Tinu, myself and others. They are glossed over by the "blind faithful"

I bet you, the one that calles himself the "HEYDUDE" have crossed the overunity borders many, and i do mean many times in your life.
It is just that in this moment, you did not realize it.
Yep that's right, it is right under his ass but he doesn't see.
This is normal you cannot recognise something if you did not see it before.
That's the human brain always searching for familiar things to execute the "where have i seen this before" files.

In order to see something new you need something else.

So who is the blind man again ?

Marco.

[broli]

Captainpecan I couldn't have said it better...baby sitting  . It's actually a familiar pattern. Experiments haven't even been started on a serious level and you already have a hoard of naysayers.

[BEP]

Yes.

Naysayers and bandwagon hoppers. It never ends.

Be careful to not include all the scientific method purists into the naysayer group. Become a purist yourself - it is needed by all.

Also don't go so far as to close your mind and repeat the same mistakes again. These are fine lines we all walk and I think each of our groups make this mistake.

Earlier someone made mention of one example:

Tesla / high frequency current. --- Why do we read like followers of Hertz when reading a Tesla patent. In Tesla's mind a hertzian wave was secondary and a waste. When he says frequency why are we thinking cycles per second? Wouldn't Tesla think in number peaks passing a point in a given time. In other words - SPEED and distance covered like a compression wave? It is not exactly the same thing.

So even the wannabees and bandwagon hoppers should consider their ideas from the perspective of almost any commentor and beleive neither side until it proves true on your bench.

--- "It is just that in this moment, you did not realize it." --- Ahmen, [marco].

I still kick myself in the ass for things I've missed!

[innovation_station]

I bet you, the one that calles himself the "HEYDUDE" have crossed the overunity borders many, and i do mean many times in your life.
It is just that in this moment, you did not realize it.
Yep that's right, it is right under his ass but he doesn't see.
This is normal you cannot recognise something if you did not see it before.
That's the human brain always searching for familiar things to execute the "where have i seen this before" files.

In order to see something new you need something else.

So who is the blind man again ?

Marco.

well marco we ALL KNOW YOU are not blind...

but you sure can be an ass sometimes    lol

ist




so wheres that other old grumpy fart that likes to piss on peoples faces.....

i thought you would have miles to wright .....