The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

[Charlie_V]

Energy can never be created. If any device showes more output than in, the first job is to investigate from where this
extra energy came from. On that basis improvements can be made on the design.

Uhm, if it cant be created, then how did it get here?

[Shrexes]

Ok, since this is a war of semantics, I will admit by the word "created" I actually meant "grabbed out of thin air by some unknown energy source."

With that being said, the experiment attempted to show that no power was lost, and that in fact some was gained from the aforementioned energy source. I brought up an explanation as to why this experiment merely confirms what science has already known. Instead of looking at the equations, we are discussing points that are frankly irrelevant right now. Of course energy cannot be created or destroyed (hence the quotations), but a small mistake in words should not make an educated person look away from the facts. Does anyone want to explain to me why my observations about this experiment are wrong and that the energy really was conserved and that the experiment really did generate free movement? That's all I'm asking for.

[innovation_station]

because the engery transfer is faster than light ....

ist

hence the trem time is gained teslas words.....

[captainpecan]

@Shrexes

Obviously from your replies, you have not followed the whole thread.  I dont blame you, it's just that it seems what your commenting on has been covered already.  Most everything I've seen you comment on was about the amount of energy in the caps, and measuring work done on the pulse motor.  Honestly, that was not what this thread was about, it was just all most people could think about.  It has been pretty much agreed upon that the pulse motor was not a very good way to measure the work done, and we've been through all that already.  Although I dont blame you for not reading all 80 pages to get caught up!  99 did some work with the capacitors and energy left in them, the link is posted to his work on the very first post of this thread now.  Please check it out, as it will help answer some of what you are asking about.

We are now back to the whole point of the video's to start with.  The fact that energy flows right through a motor, and can be used again. It's what conservation of energy could really mean. Please read from page 77 on and you will see the video we are discussing. I also posted some test results half way down page 77 also that ties into it. Thanks for your comments, I hope this helps bring you up to speed a little with whats being talked about now.

[Shrexes]

@ captainpecan

I took your advice and watched the three test video with the motor. There is still nothing "free" about it.

I have already shown how the charges cannot be added up. Therefore, 18 > 9+9. The reason why is because it's a matter of high density to low density transfer of charge. Using it in a different example.....

You have two pressurized water tanks. One is 18 psi and the other is a vacuum, 0 psi. You have a thin tube connecting them, and we're assuming it's a perfect system with no leaks or extraneous losses. If you open the tanks, the water pressure will equalize between the two because water will rush out of the high density to the low density. This is going to happen whether the waters movement is restricted or not. However, lets put a paddle wheel inside the tube connecting the two tanks. Now, the water will rush through and spin the wheel, but in the end both tanks will have equal pressure. Essentially, you are only using energy that would otherwise be wasted.

You can release the air out of a pressurized air tank, or you can blow it through a small wind mill so that it's at least doing something as it's released.