Joule Thief

[stprue]

it should be easly done  stpure your windings ... wanna help ...  just all in 1 unit ..  like 1 core 2.5 v few amps driveing the thing ... ill get on this too soon

i have plans of building things all fall and winter for next spring ...

I am excited also...and I have just ordered some high voltage stuff!  Can't wait!

[innovation_station]

MK1
Did you verify the claims yourself?

You know it was Faraday who tried and tried to find electricity coming from a steady magnetic field and he found he could not.

Are you saying you have found how to do that?
I do not think sticking a magnet onto a pulsing magnetic field is the same thing, but is that what you mean by standing magnet?
I have found that adding a magnet increases frequency and lowers voltage.
I personally believe higher frequency actually means we need less amps, so it may work.

@ist,
Have you been able to get heat from less than the watt cost of a standard heater?
I watched your spark heaters and It got me thinking a lot about immersion heaters, but in those videos you were using so much power, it was hard to see if what you were doing was more efficient??
Was it?

I found what you were showing very hopeful, but I was not too sure about the power use.

jeanna

about the comment that is bolded ...

i think he took the wrong aproch ... 

call it a hunch ...   

i will touch on this 1 more time ok ...

if you were able to cancel entirely the flow from a good sized neo magnet ...  all that would be required to get electricty FROM A MAGNET ONLY WOULD BE THE MAGNET... 

hope you understand it ... 

that as far as i know is mac's  work aswell ..... 

it is easly done ...

ist!

the only moveing part and there are 2 is the flux from the neo magnet .. and the transistor or reed switch ...

depends if you use an external source to controll it or not ...

the magnet does not move .... you place it there it does its magic remove it.... it stops ...

a few ways this style unit can work ...   

neo
----
coil
----
====
steel

ist

think bout it ...

just imagine you had a neo that can lift 200lbs ... and you can stop the force comeing from it ... with out any applyed power then you release it 200lbs of pull flying at the speed of magnetics to the steel it hits the steel you stop it ... and do it agin ... 

im sure you can control a transistor to short and un short the coil ...  with a small freq genny ... 


this is to get rid of the use of a battery as the supply ...

now this could also be done electromagnetically... 

basiclly you have a coil putting out a flux ... and another that cancles it ... you turn on and off the canceling winding ... now its a whole new game ...

[Mk1]

I have spoke a lot on " la synergetique" , D'Hoker , naudin's VSG and so on :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4744.msg98997#msg98997

there is no verification on this device or others similars devices

look at this thread :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1310.msg10528#msg10528

Humm ... You can read french ... but thanks for the info anyway.

Merci . Don't you consider a magazine article enough ?

[jeanna]

basically you have a coil putting out a flux ... and another that cancels it ... you turn on and off the canceling winding ... now its a whole new game ...

Ist,
Thanks but this is pure Faraday.
If you stop and start the transistor you are changing the magnetic field inside the toroid.
The quicker you stop or start it the MORE voltage you get out of it.
This is the stuff Tesla was undoubtedly calculating in his head. But it was not Tesla, it was Tesla using Faraday in a way the others did not.

I am looking forward to your experiments, but I completely disagree with the use of a signal generator that uses wall power.
I also think if you change from AA to 12 volts or anything else you have lost ALL ability to show a comparison.

So, getting rid of the battery that switched the transistor is exactly what I do not want to do.

Go for it, but I will only read and not do it until you can prove the same thing without the wall source.

Thank you,

jeanna

[jeanna]

My apologies for 2 in a row, but this is such a different topic, I feel I must.

OK remember about 6 weeks ago I made a .MOV file that only a few people wanted to see?
I am not referring to the ones that I linked to zero info by mistake.

I received comments from Bill and Xee2 about how quicktime wreaks havok on their systems etc.

On a macusers forum someone wanted info on showing her movies and was told by the apple specialist that everyone could get quicktime for windows etc. I thought I should mention this problem to them, so other mac users would know the reason for the reluctance etc.

I think I made someone mad, but I will leave that one out of this. I got this information.
I hope it helps:

====

"...when you open a QT movie file on a Windows machine, it asks you if you want to use the QT application for all other similar files. If you say yes, change settings, then yes, QT will become the default player. But, if you say No, it will just open for that one file.

I have several machines with both Windows and Mac, plus I frequently work in all PC environments, and I've NEVER had to reboot, go to Start up, or anything like..."

====

I hope this helps.
I will continue to use youtube. I only posted this for the information.

jeanna