Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief

Started by Pirate88179, November 20, 2008, 03:07:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 152 Guests are viewing this topic.

resonanceman

Quote from: resonanceman on June 05, 2009, 10:07:52 PM
Jeanna

OK
I will  try to keep this  simple .........but be prepared to be confused   anyway .

choose  any 3 consecutive taps  for your  primararys    ..... with this particular  coil  that makes the   primarys 90 ft long .

For maximum  voltge     you need the  secondary to be as long as possable  .....so  lets   go with 300 ft . 
The   magneitc  flux induced  by  your primary  coils   will induce voltage in ALL the other coils ........ the  fact that   some of those  coils are also the  primary  doesn't seem to matter much .
The   current is induced where it is induced ...... 

I am sure that there is  some  " leakage "  between  coils ......maybe quite a bit ............but it is not  noticeable in the  behavior of the JT
The  LED  was brighter  than  my  other LMs
It may suffer in its ability  to  output power ......it is to soon to tell  about that


gary

resonanceman

Quote from: jeanna on June 05, 2009, 10:14:57 PM
OK thanks.
It is very clear.
and then who cares if you are lighting lots of lights with just a bunch of coiled wire?

this is 1.2v battery isn't it?

jeanna


Jeanna

I am glad that you understand now

I find that  when I  try to explain something in detail        I end up learning it all over again at a deeper level .


Now ........a question I have to ask is .
If  we can use the entire coil as a secondary  on the one wire  LM ........why can't we use the whole  coil every time with every JT ?


gary   

Mk1

Quote from: resonanceman on June 05, 2009, 10:37:26 PM



Now ........a question I have to ask is .
If  we can use the entire coil as a secondary  on the one wire  LM ........why can't we use the whole  coil every time with every JT ?


I personally think its a waist of wire , i can get better result with 30 inch on my toroid , and even less, if you use a 30 feet primary how long would a secondary to get reasonable gain ratio, charging a battery its good but some are a bit confused , a circuit that only charges battery is useless , if you don't use the battery then it stays charged , you don't need a charger for that .


I have a question , how can you have secondary since all the coils are connected together.


Mark

jeanna

Quote from: resonanceman on June 05, 2009, 10:37:26 PM


I find that  when I  try to explain something in detail        I end up learning it all over again at a deeper level
I love how that works! I am glad I could help!!  ;).

Quote....why can't we use the whole  coil every time with every JT ?

1- Why do you think we don't?
and
2- Take a look at the 2 tier circuit. Follow the path of the currents.. they actually do have sections that operate at an enhanced or diminished rate.

Thanks for the reminder. I promised a drawing.

jeanna

TheNOP

Quote from: jeanna on June 05, 2009, 05:09:11 PMBack then, they called this "make and break".
We are unfamiliar with that term, but before the 20th century, the electrical engineers had to use sparks... for everything including proving there was electricity in the wires.

When Stubblefield referred to the 'normal make and break' we were all puzzled. If you look at some of the writings from back then, you see make and break are referring to sparks, or spark gaps.
i think the "make and break" was a rotary swithching device, kinda like relays.

the reason i think this, is that spark gaps need relatively high voltage to start sparking.
hv was not really what was used the most at that time.
in some researches perhap, but not mainstream.