Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Low Current HHO Production.

Started by Hydro-Cell, November 26, 2008, 11:40:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CrazyEwok

I have a few questions and suggestion for a low current HOD system that i am currently building... Unfortunately measure thrise cut once, so everything takes for ever on my experiments. But i thought that i would share some of my ideas as it may help some people here with their projects...
1. As i understand it requires X amount of energy to separate water. Now thinking a little out of the box can we get a portion of X from somewhere other than electricity. Steam requires less power to electrolize than liquid water (this is from my high school chem memories so correct me if i am wrong) but the electrical contact is harder. What about if the area where the reaction was to take place was pressureized a little. This would mean you should be able to get the water hotter (more energy from a heat source) without it turning into steam. Ofcourse collecting the gas produced gets harder but you get that.

2. Electrical efficientcy. - Instead of just charging electrodes would it be possible to calch some of that power into capacitors and then reuse it along other electrodes? like a chain power from one gets used in the next, until there is no power left to charge a capacitor that way your getting all of the work you can out off all the electricity you use?

3. Production Lag. For the eventual ability for a car to run on 100% generated hydrogen there would need to be a reserve or something so that when you put your foot down on the gas you don't get production lag...

4. Adgitation. - Movement of the water (preferably through a filter to clean out any impurities) if this can be coincided into the thermo-movement of water from suggestion 1. on the entranc side a "vortex" maybe produced. Which is another point that has been said to improve production.


My current test will be on pulsed coil electrodes into a chamber that is heated but is piped into a "cooling" area to create a water cycle. The thought is if i can moderate the temperature at a point where the reaction happens the easiest (i think this is the temperature right before water turns into steam) anad attempted to channel the current so as it enters it creates a sort of whirl pool effect in the chamber. But this is all theory and i am running 3 projects at once so it is going to take a long time to get this one going. That is why i am posting it here. There a people here with more time to work on this than me and the thought that combining all this may help someone crack it is worth me putting it up here.


On a separate point has anyone tried using some of the generated AC current from an alternator before it is turned into the DC current of your battery? what effect does AC current have on the process??? just a thought...

leeroyjenkinsii

Looks like this crackpot never materialized any real documents, video evidence or diagrams.   Just another scam?

jadaro2600

Quote from: Paul-R on November 29, 2008, 09:47:04 AM
I think you will find this of value:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter10.pdf
Don't forget that it is the basis of the Meyer and Boyce
systems that the voltage (rather than the current) that
does the business.
Paul.

I've looked at this file, and the diagrams seem 'flimzy'

It's not that easy to fabricate a hydrocell, the closest durable setup i've seen is the joe-cell and other similar physical cells.  The stainless steel will corrode, there's no getting around it, the electricity destroys it.

You should be using carbon as the conductor, and less electrolyte.  A base addative is going to drastically alter the conductance, and increase the amount of current flowing through it and thus going back to source.

I thought the point was to put as much energy into the breaking of the molecules as possible.

I can't seem to get anything that will create a cracking frequency of 42.8khz.. any suggestions.

Quote from: leeroyjenkinsii on September 06, 2009, 11:30:42 PM
Looks like this crackpot never materialized any real documents, video evidence or diagrams.   Just another scam?

Funny stuff; I don't think anyone has created such a thing yet anyway - has anyone tried to take apart these fuel cells that are currently being used by automotive manufactureres - perhaps an inventive improvement is what's needed?