Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[Cap-Z-ro]

Nothing huh ?

Thought as much..all mouth...as predicted

Ever think of changing your user name from Grumpy to Abusive...do it...its perfect for you.

Go back in your hole and roll around in your own misery...you are nothing but a lout and a loser who can do nothing but talk...and abusively at that.

Pfft...

[ramset]

THEBUZZ SAID
I suppose it would begin with the assumption that all there is, is energy. If I had to make a guess, I suspect that half the energy in the universe is in the form of mass. Mass is energy that is compressed, spinning and polarized.

Explaining how energy is compressed into matter is probably best done by taking a field trip to the website of Milo Wolf http://quantummatter.com/articles/see_an_electron.html

and looking at a image of the galaxy we live in.

http://www2.lns.mit.edu/~LQS/Milky_Way_galaxy_sun05.jpg

Our universe is made of fractals and surely the reason that if you expand Mandelbrot's equation out to the size of the universe, you begin to see images of snow covered mountains, trees and other things we see everyday. If you truly want to know the shape of the universe, look in a mirror. Edgar Cayce and the law of probability should be required reading for anyone wanting a better understanding of the cosmos.

Free energy:
The term free energy creates a reaction with an educated person since it implies energy from nothing. This of course is impossible and silly and so the reaction is justified.

A better term would be "economic free energy". Since a gallon of water contains the atomic energy equivalent, equal to the chemical equivalent of millions of barrels of oil, the gallon of water would represent economic free energy.

The best term would be mass to atomic energy converter. Since all free energy devices do just that. Energy does not come from nothing - no exceptions.

Zero Point:
Notice nowhere in that simple equation E=MC2 is there anything that represents aether or zero point? I am going to stick with my own experience and some of the best scientific minds on Earth. Of course there is a zero point and of course there is less than a zero point. It would be impossible to have a black hole without less than zero and so everything in between exists as well. It has nothing to to do with free energy.

Aether:
The aether field was measured and observed by Dayton Miller using light-beam interferometry in the early part of the 1900s to measure an Earth-entrained aether drift.

Many scientist assumed and wrote of the existence of the aether field which included Crookes, Lodge, Faraday, Michelson, Moorley, Miller, Tesla, Reich and even Einstein.

Einstein later denied the aether field and this is confirmed in a letter he wrote to Shankland thanking him for disproving Miller. In the letter Einstein acknowledged that the existence of the aether would invalidate special relativity.

"Dear Dr. Shankland:
I thank you very much for sending me your careful study about the Miller experiments. Those experiments, conducted with so much care, merit, of course, a very careful statistical investigation. This is more so as the existence of a not trivial positive effect would affect very deeply the fundament of theoretical physics as it is presently accepted.

You have shown convincingly that the observed effect is outside the range of accidental deviations and must, therefore, have a systematic cause. You made it quite probable that this systematic cause has nothing to do with 'ether-wind', but has to do with differences of temperature of the air traversed by the two light bundles which produced the bands of interference. Such an effect is indeed practically inevitable if the walls of the laboratory room have a not negligible difference in temperature.
It is one of the cases where the systematic errors are increasing quickly with the dimension of the apparatus.

Congratulating you and your colleagues on your valuable contribution to our knowledge,

I am with kind regards,
A. Einstein" (31 August 1954)

(contained in Shankland, Applied Optics 1973, p.2283)

Dayton Miller did 10,000 hours of observation of the aether on a mountain near Ashland Oregon. His observations concluded the field moves at 24.5 kilometers per hour across the planet, concentrated between -100 meters below the surface and +300 meters above the surface and departs the planet in the direction of the constellation Leo. It tends to flow around objects like mountains but also flows through them to some extent.

My own thoughts on this are that given the fact that aether has been proven to come from space and return to space reveal that it is sourced by a larger body such as the solar system or the Milky Way Galaxy or perhaps any large body of mass. Daton Miller's experiments indicated that there was an aether drift that also flowed from the Sun.

No boat plies the water as fast as the wind that blows upon the square sail. The aether drift therefor is moving 24.5 kilometers per hour faster than our solar system.

Regardless of what the aether is, it can be said with relative certainty what it is not. Is is not a source of free energy. Mass to atomic energy conversion and the aether drift are two entirely two different subjects.

Converting energy into mass:
Milo Wolf did excellent work describing the science behind energy to mass conversion using a inbound longitudinal wave superimposed over an outbound longitudinal wave. His website is filled with information on the wave structure of matter. http://www.quantummatter.com/

So now that one has a basic understanding that mass is concentrated energy, how it got that way and the state that it exists we look at the opposite of that process.

Converting mass into energy (cavitation):
I have done some research on converting mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass which is the opposite of Milo Wolf but his wave matter structure helps to understand the process of cavitation which destroys that wave structure releasing the atomic energy of the mass.

If you go to Wiki and look up cavitation it begins:

"Cavitation - "Cavitation is defined as the phenomenon..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavitation

Next we look up phenomenon:
http://www.answers.com/topic/phenomenon
"An occurrence, circumstance, or fact that is perceptible by the senses.
An unusual, significant, or unaccountable fact or occurrence; a marvel."

So it is fairly common usage and definition of the word phenomenon that it is something we observe but can't explain.

Wouldn't it be silly to suggest that cavitation can only occur in a liquid? I have heard a sonic boom referred to as a cavitation plenty of times because it is. The emitted light can be observed on the rotor tips of a helicopter through night vision equipment, etc.

So to produce a cavitation, we move energy or mass through an ambient medium such as a gas, liquid or solid faster than the atoms of the ambient medium can react and in the process drag a pocket (cavity) into that medium.

The ambient medium then collapses that pocket or empty space like a trillion atom smashers all pointed that the center, the pocket slams back together with the pressure of the ambient medium.

This results in the formation of electron clusters. Electrons do not want to stay clustered (Columb's law) and so they explode back outward with the pressure and speed of atomic energy and knock other electrons free from the ambient medium and produces electron cascade effect.

"Nobody ever thought of using an accelerator before." - Stan Meyer

The energy we place into the process is focused on a much smaller area (the center of the cavity) and when the atomic energy was released from the mass, the energy released included our original input energy that created the cavity and any energy that was released when some of the mass was converted into the atomic energy contained within the mass.

Thermodynamics:
The laws of thermodynamics do not apply to this process. The first three were written by men describing fire and steam engines. Men that had never seen a telephone or an automobile, airplane or even perhaps an electric light. That should relegate thermodynamics to it's proper role in this discussion.

The law of force F=MA:
The law of force has three exceptions, one of which is if the mass is moving at or near the speed of quantum entanglement.

Definition of ambient medium (states of matter):
Solids, liquids or gases.

I do not consider a plasma a state of matter since it is a fact that matter is transmuted in a plasma. Matter that is changing is not in a state.

If you look up the definition of plasma:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/state

...and you look at definition 5:
5.  Physics The condition of a physical system with regard to phase, form, composition, or structure: Ice is the solid state of water.

The definition implies a stability or form. Matter that is changing at quantum speed does not fit that definition and only serves to relegate the other states of matter to an undefined meaning.

So I feel that a better way to define a plasma is "matter in a state of change."

So in a nutshell...

    * Free energy devices can only do one thing - convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass and cavitation is required to accomplish that.
    * Any mass can be cavitated in any state.
    * Plasma is not a state of matter, it is matter in a state of change due to the fact that it is a cavitation.

You show me a free energy device that is not an energy receiver and I will show you where a cavitation is taking place.

References organized chronologically:
Dayton Miller's Ether-Drift Experiments: A Fresh Look by James DeMeo, Ph.D.
Director, Orgone Biophysical Research Lab
Greensprings, PO Box 1148, Ashland, Oregon 97520 USA.
Tel/Fax: 541-552-0118
E-mail to: info(at)orgonelab.org
http://www.orgonelab.org/miller2.htm

Milo Wolf - Quantum Matter
http://www.quantummatter.com/

« Last Edit: December 13, 2008, 12:27:01 PM by TheBuzz »  Report to moderator    Logged 

[Grumpy]

Nothing huh ?

Thought as much..all mouth...as predicted

Ever think of changing your user name from Grumpy to Abusive...do it...its perfect for you.

Go back in your hole and roll around in your own misery...you are nothing but a lout and a loser who can do nothing but talk...and abusively at that.

Pfft...

I am not the least bit sorry that I pointed out that your circuit and patent are worthless and that you have wasted a great deal of time and money.

[ramset]

Buzz Said I suppose it would begin with the assumption that all there is, is energy. If I had to make a guess, I suspect that half the energy in the universe is in the form of mass. Mass is energy that is compressed, spinning and polarized.

Explaining how energy is compressed into matter is probably best done by taking a field trip to the website of Milo Wolf http://quantummatter.com/articles/see_an_electron.html

and looking at a image of the galaxy we live in.

http://www2.lns.mit.edu/~LQS/Milky_Way_galaxy_sun05.jpg

Our universe is made of fractals and surely the reason that if you expand Mandelbrot's equation out to the size of the universe, you begin to see images of snow covered mountains, trees and other things we see everyday. If you truly want to know the shape of the universe, look in a mirror. Edgar Cayce and the law of probability should be required reading for anyone wanting a better understanding of the cosmos.

Free energy:
The term free energy creates a reaction with an educated person since it implies energy from nothing. This of course is impossible and silly and so the reaction is justified.

A better term would be "economic free energy". Since a gallon of water contains the atomic energy equivalent, equal to the chemical equivalent of millions of barrels of oil, the gallon of water would represent economic free energy.

The best term would be mass to atomic energy converter. Since all free energy devices do just that. Energy does not come from nothing - no exceptions.

Zero Point:
Notice nowhere in that simple equation E=MC2 is there anything that represents aether or zero point? I am going to stick with my own experience and some of the best scientific minds on Earth. Of course there is a zero point and of course there is less than a zero point. It would be impossible to have a black hole without less than zero and so everything in between exists as well. It has nothing to to do with free energy.

Aether:
The aether field was measured and observed by Dayton Miller using light-beam interferometry in the early part of the 1900s to measure an Earth-entrained aether drift.

Many scientist assumed and wrote of the existence of the aether field which included Crookes, Lodge, Faraday, Michelson, Moorley, Miller, Tesla, Reich and even Einstein.

Einstein later denied the aether field and this is confirmed in a letter he wrote to Shankland thanking him for disproving Miller. In the letter Einstein acknowledged that the existence of the aether would invalidate special relativity.

"Dear Dr. Shankland:
I thank you very much for sending me your careful study about the Miller experiments. Those experiments, conducted with so much care, merit, of course, a very careful statistical investigation. This is more so as the existence of a not trivial positive effect would affect very deeply the fundament of theoretical physics as it is presently accepted.

You have shown convincingly that the observed effect is outside the range of accidental deviations and must, therefore, have a systematic cause. You made it quite probable that this systematic cause has nothing to do with 'ether-wind', but has to do with differences of temperature of the air traversed by the two light bundles which produced the bands of interference. Such an effect is indeed practically inevitable if the walls of the laboratory room have a not negligible difference in temperature.
It is one of the cases where the systematic errors are increasing quickly with the dimension of the apparatus.

Congratulating you and your colleagues on your valuable contribution to our knowledge,

I am with kind regards,
A. Einstein" (31 August 1954)

(contained in Shankland, Applied Optics 1973, p.2283)

Dayton Miller did 10,000 hours of observation of the aether on a mountain near Ashland Oregon. His observations concluded the field moves at 24.5 kilometers per hour across the planet, concentrated between -100 meters below the surface and +300 meters above the surface and departs the planet in the direction of the constellation Leo. It tends to flow around objects like mountains but also flows through them to some extent.

My own thoughts on this are that given the fact that aether has been proven to come from space and return to space reveal that it is sourced by a larger body such as the solar system or the Milky Way Galaxy or perhaps any large body of mass. Daton Miller's experiments indicated that there was an aether drift that also flowed from the Sun.

No boat plies the water as fast as the wind that blows upon the square sail. The aether drift therefor is moving 24.5 kilometers per hour faster than our solar system.

Regardless of what the aether is, it can be said with relative certainty what it is not. Is is not a source of free energy. Mass to atomic energy conversion and the aether drift are two entirely two different subjects.

Converting energy into mass:
Milo Wolf did excellent work describing the science behind energy to mass conversion using a inbound longitudinal wave superimposed over an outbound longitudinal wave. His website is filled with information on the wave structure of matter. http://www.quantummatter.com/

So now that one has a basic understanding that mass is concentrated energy, how it got that way and the state that it exists we look at the opposite of that process.

Converting mass into energy (cavitation):
I have done some research on converting mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass which is the opposite of Milo Wolf but his wave matter structure helps to understand the process of cavitation which destroys that wave structure releasing the atomic energy of the mass.

If you go to Wiki and look up cavitation it begins:

"Cavitation - "Cavitation is defined as the phenomenon..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavitation

Next we look up phenomenon:
http://www.answers.com/topic/phenomenon
"An occurrence, circumstance, or fact that is perceptible by the senses.
An unusual, significant, or unaccountable fact or occurrence; a marvel."

So it is fairly common usage and definition of the word phenomenon that it is something we observe but can't explain.

Wouldn't it be silly to suggest that cavitation can only occur in a liquid? I have heard a sonic boom referred to as a cavitation plenty of times because it is. The emitted light can be observed on the rotor tips of a helicopter through night vision equipment, etc.

So to produce a cavitation, we move energy or mass through an ambient medium such as a gas, liquid or solid faster than the atoms of the ambient medium can react and in the process drag a pocket (cavity) into that medium.

The ambient medium then collapses that pocket or empty space like a trillion atom smashers all pointed that the center, the pocket slams back together with the pressure of the ambient medium.

This results in the formation of electron clusters. Electrons do not want to stay clustered (Columb's law) and so they explode back outward with the pressure and speed of atomic energy and knock other electrons free from the ambient medium and produces electron cascade effect.

"Nobody ever thought of using an accelerator before." - Stan Meyer

The energy we place into the process is focused on a much smaller area (the center of the cavity) and when the atomic energy was released from the mass, the energy released included our original input energy that created the cavity and any energy that was released when some of the mass was converted into the atomic energy contained within the mass.

Thermodynamics:
The laws of thermodynamics do not apply to this process. The first three were written by men describing fire and steam engines. Men that had never seen a telephone or an automobile, airplane or even perhaps an electric light. That should relegate thermodynamics to it's proper role in this discussion.

The law of force F=MA:
The law of force has three exceptions, one of which is if the mass is moving at or near the speed of quantum entanglement.

Definition of ambient medium (states of matter):
Solids, liquids or gases.

I do not consider a plasma a state of matter since it is a fact that matter is transmuted in a plasma. Matter that is changing is not in a state.

If you look up the definition of plasma:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/state

...and you look at definition 5:
5.  Physics The condition of a physical system with regard to phase, form, composition, or structure: Ice is the solid state of water.

The definition implies a stability or form. Matter that is changing at quantum speed does not fit that definition and only serves to relegate the other states of matter to an undefined meaning.

So I feel that a better way to define a plasma is "matter in a state of change."

So in a nutshell...

    * Free energy devices can only do one thing - convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass and cavitation is required to accomplish that.
    * Any mass can be cavitated in any state.
    * Plasma is not a state of matter, it is matter in a state of change due to the fact that it is a cavitation.

You show me a free energy device that is not an energy receiver and I will show you where a cavitation is taking place.

References organized chronologically:
Dayton Miller's Ether-Drift Experiments: A Fresh Look by James DeMeo, Ph.D.
Director, Orgone Biophysical Research Lab
Greensprings, PO Box 1148, Ashland, Oregon 97520 USA.
Tel/Fax: 541-552-0118
E-mail to: info(at)orgonelab.org
http://www.orgonelab.org/miller2.htm

Milo Wolf - Quantum Matter
http://www.quantummatter.com/

« Last Edit: December 13, 2008, 12:27:01 PM by TheBuzz »  Report to moderator    Logged 

[Cap-Z-ro]

" I am not the least bit sorry that I pointed out that your circuit and patent are worthless and that you have wasted a great deal of time and money. "


Oh...but you are sorry...very sorry...that statement was about as senseless a response as any I have ever seen online.

That, and ranset's re-posting of his guru's long winded post, is the signal that both of you have now come to the point where you have run out of things to say...and are regretting opening up your big mouths...at least that is progress...of a sort.

Your mothers will be so proud.