Simplist Overunity Device on the Planet

[sparks]

     The fans pictured are just one type of load so it's not using a turbine effect.  One fan is on the rotor and the other fan is bolted to the stator.  The whole deal is suspended or tied down by support bearings on a double shaft motor.  Now say we brake the stator.  The rotor fan takes off and is driven normally.  The brake is removed and the stator begins to rotate in direction opposite that of the loaded fan and the rpm of the rotor drops.  As the stator accelerates it's attached fan begins to load up.  This load braking causes the rotor fan to speed up.  Now this load braking causes the stator fan to speed up.   The motor now doesn't know which component is the stator and which one is the rotor because they are now both rotors and stators only dependent on the load brake torque to determine which is which.  The loads are matched therefore the motor doesn't know which one of it's elements is receiving the brake torque. 

[sparks]

Heck, you're missing a whole source of OU. The second fan can be driven by the blast from the first fan. Put a torque converter in there and stand back.

You got something there.  If the rotorfan is loaded by the statorfan  and vise versa she's gonna take off.  This has happened before.  When Westinghouse first attempted to parallel operate two large ac alternators they were working with seperate govenors.   Alternately changing from induction alternators to motors.  The prime movers at this point became the load.  There was no way to stop the units fast enough as the current levels welded the relays.  The units ran up to such high rpm they blew the prime movers apart. 
You gotta laugh when you picture the tree burners plants trying to avoid this from happening when they try to synchronize a power plant coming on line.
They are avoiding free reactive energy!  Or are they?

[Creativity]

Isn't this how turbine pumps work?
Multiple blades mounted on one shaft? 
Or am I missing a point here?

looks exactly the same to me.
Ok i will try to make it in a picture.No fricion loses,no conversion loses.
Imagine one blade on one engine,it presents a load to the engine.Make it spinn in vacuum and it will present no load and engine will spinna t it's max speed(like without any load).
Blade is capable of making a wind of speed 1m/s at rotation of 1000rpm.
Now i blow on the blade. Blade is facing a wind of 0.5 m/s in the direction of its operation.

As a result the total wind will become 1.5 m/s and motor will speed up to the speed that makes the blade to be the same load as without frontal blow.Why?because the frontal wind creates a conditions of less resistance for the blade(frontal wind pushing the blades to rotate faster).

OK now we have 2 identical engines with 2 identical blades.We set them up in a tunnel so all the wind produced by blade 1 in passing through the blade2.
Obviously both blades will rotate faster than normally because both are facing lower resistance due to frontal wind created by other blade.Total wind out of tunnel will be 2m/s however.See that higher rotation of blades(and engines) does not implicates that they use or produce more power...just that load got smaller.
Hope it is clear now.

[AbbaRue]

@sparks
I get the picture now.
Instead of 1 shaft turning at 1200 rpm. in one direction.
you have 2 shafts turning at  600 rpm. in opposite directions.
But to the outside world we still get 1200 rpm.
Are you implying that this motor uses half as much power to run because of this?

[infringer]

I am totally missing the point as well where you get over unity here is beyond me I have thought this through fairly well I believe and I do not see advantage in so to speak.

But please do continue down the path it is people who give up that do not succeed.

-infringer-