"Smoking Gun" - finally!

[PaulLowrance]

Ooops, the math. .. I'll show you mine when you'll show me yours... OK?

But I already showed my math for a long time -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/dirtydetails/

And you can also see my math in javascript source code -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/tools/customdiodedesigner/

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/tools/diodenate/

And spice -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/rectificationanalysis/

Anyway, the math is "just" a tool, depending on the stuff you want to present or defend.... The physics (our current level of understanding of nature) clearly shows there isn't much to talk about actually breaking "The LAWS"...

And who told you that? There are endless debates occurring amongst conventional physicists on both quantum and classical mechanics, including the very foundations of quantum physics. Yes spinner, some very heated debates. Recently I was observing a heated lengthy debate regarding the new experiment on the lines of the single photon double split experiment, which questions the very foundations of QM.

Ok, with a decent proof, the world would change instantly

I'm uncertain what world that would that be on?  It's certainly not conventional physicists on Earth. 

I'm not interested in your challenge... Why? Because I trust all those millions of technicians, engineers, physicists,... and the the rest of devoted individuals who were dealing with this kind of stuff in the past.

And who might that be?  Send them over here.  I've probably talked to them. Guess what? They can't show the semiconductor math to prove their claim. Even the claimed genius, the creator of LTspice, Mike Englehardt, says that the semiconductor mathematics shows that I am correct, that diodes would rectify Johnson noise.

Classical mechanics lasted 400 years! And I can assure you that quantum mechanics will have a much shorter life span. It's days are numbered. Same goes for the laws of thermodynamics.


If you're wondering why conventional physics is having difficulty with the diode effect -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/stillunknown/

OK, I'll byte... Which math equation clearly shows the thermal energy gain  of a single diode (or PN junction?)?
Rectifying is a circular process, you need to observe it as such...
I came from the old school... Enlighten me, please... I'm prepared to learn!

I'll do even better. I'll show you the entire numerical analysis mathematics. Just go to the following web page, and have your web browser display the html source code. The html contains javascript where you'll find all of the mathematics -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/tools/diodenate/


PL

[PaulLowrance]

I forgot to mention that if you want to see a lot of mathematics then go to my custom diode designer -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/tools/customdiodedesigner/

PL

[tinu]

Hi PL,

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/dirtydetails/
“Solving the DC voltage produced by the above diode is solvable only by means of numerical analysis.”

I’m glad to learn that solving is eventually ...solvable  but it’s finally of no help:
A diode does not rectify its own thermal noise. Period.
Moreover, for the sake of clarity: the noise of a diode is AC, not DC. Same period again.

Please prove the above wrong in an attempt to save the modeling, which is wrong. It’s the second time I kindly ask to show some references about the above.
And please show respect to thermodynamics as long as it is valid.

Cheers,
Tinu

[TechStuf]

The world would be more peaceful and quieter..?. Yes!

Since I was merely advocating that the outgassing of pessimistic naysayers be harnessed, and you, spinner, seem to be advocating that everyone in the world be made silent.....


Let me humbly suggest that you take that first bold step and watch for the world to follow.


Didn't think so....


TS

[PaulLowrance]

Hi PL,

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/dirtydetails/
“Solving the DC voltage produced by the above diode is solvable only by means of numerical analysis.”

I’m glad to learn that solving is eventually ...solvable  but it’s finally of no help:
A diode does not rectify its own thermal noise. Period.
Moreover, for the sake of clarity: the noise of a diode is AC, not DC. Same period again.

Please prove the above wrong in an attempt to save the modeling, which is wrong. It’s the second time I kindly ask to show some references about the above.
And please show respect to thermodynamics as long as it is valid.

Cheers,
Tinu

Sorry tinu, but I've shown my math, and my experiments. You have shown nothing.  I'm uninterested in your ambiguous handwaving discussion.

PL