"Smoking Gun" - finally!

[tinu]

Hi PL,

I’ve shown you my physics. 

Why are you so bothered?
Is it because you probably never considered that mistake about self rectification of own noise or because you can not explain exceeding Carnot? Of course you can’t exceed it. Nobody can.
Or may it be because you want to make a business in OU, a workable forum or something similar and I might jeopardize your marketing and recruitment campaign? Don’t worry; I won’t come into your forum. But for now you are the one here, promoting hardly a physical non-sense.

I’m not interested either in talking to you from now on. I still reserve my right to express my views for the members of this forum.

Cheers,
Tinu

[PaulLowrance]

I’ve shown you my physics. 

Sorry, I don't consider handwaving as "physics."

Why are you so bothered?
Is it because you probably never considered that mistake about self rectification of own noise or because you can not explain exceeding Carnot? Of course you can’t exceed it. Nobody can.
Or may it be because you want to make a business in OU, a workable forum or something similar and I might jeopardize your marketing and recruitment campaign? Don’t worry; I won’t come into your forum. But for now you are the one here, promoting hardly a physical non-sense.

I’m not interested either in talking to you from now on. I still reserve my right to express my views for the members of this forum.

Cheers,
Tinu

I'm not bothered by you what so ever, or your handwaving.   If you ever decide to show some mathematics, then let me know. I have shown my math and experiments at my website. You have shown nothing but negativity and handwaving. Lets see your improved semiconductor mathematics. Good luck to you.


To other people. From day one of my research, which was posted at peswiki, I have clearly stated I will not accept money. I am not in the business of making money with my diode array or magnetic research, or my website, but to help this world as much as possible at my sacrifice. You will never find ads at my research website.


To *any* EE or physicist at a University, or any reputable scientist, I would be more than happy to allow you to analyze my diode array.


PL

[tinu]

Hi all,

I questioned from the beginning the validity of the so called proof of ‘diode array’ setup. There is no mathematical proof and the physics employed to understand the device has major cracks. Nonetheless, beyond everything the most solid and the ultimate proof is the experiment and we all could read that the experiments were a success, confirming the theory. Hence, I’ve just start studying the evidences.

But, there is only one very tiny chart(!) available at:
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/experiments/charts/linechart1.html

Although data is very summary, one may read bellow the chart:
“Before "day 1" in the above chart, the voltage was well over 100uV DC. The diode arrays DC voltage began to drop after rapidly increasing the diode arrays temperature by ~ 30F. After ~ three days the voltage fell to it's lowest point, 10.5 uV. For ~ 3 to 4 afterward, the diode array voltage increased by a slight amount. From there, the voltage began to increase at a faster rate. The data was not logged. “

The bold part unfortunately shows that the experiment does not confirm the theory and consequently, the theory shall be considered wrong. That’s because a diode matrix that would rectify thermal noise (which is proportional with the temperature) should increase its output voltage when temperature increases but the experiment clearly shows the opposite.

Sorry for the bad news,
Tinu

[PaulLowrance]

Hi all,

I questioned from the beginning the validity of the so called proof of ‘diode array’ setup. There is no mathematical proof and the physics employed to understand the device has major cracks. Nonetheless, beyond everything the most solid and the ultimate proof is the experiment and we all could read that the experiments were a success, confirming the theory. Hence, I’ve just start studying the evidences.

But, there is only one very tiny chart(!) available at:
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/experiments/charts/linechart1.html

Although data is very summary, one may read bellow the chart:
“Before "day 1" in the above chart, the voltage was well over 100uV DC. The diode arrays DC voltage began to drop after rapidly increasing the diode arrays temperature by ~ 30F. After ~ three days the voltage fell to it's lowest point, 10.5 uV. For ~ 3 to 4 afterward, the diode array voltage increased by a slight amount. From there, the voltage began to increase at a faster rate. The data was not logged. “

The bold part unfortunately shows that the experiment does not confirm the theory and consequently, the theory shall be considered wrong.

That's just more of your claims that are void of mathematics.

That’s because a diode matrix that would rectify thermal noise (which is proportional with the temperature) should increase its output voltage when temperature increases but the experiment clearly shows the opposite.

Sorry for the bad news,
Tinu

More handwaving, as you clearly distort the truth.


Perhaps tinu's goal is to prevent people from replicating the diode array.   So how are they going to stop me when I build semiconductor fabrication equipment. Is that when I get a bullet in my head?


PL

[Trino Cularoid]

Perhaps tinu's goal is to prevent people from replicating the diode array.

Mostly to inflate the ego by serving postings with bile as dressing. Not the only one in this forum. Please ignore (this posting also  ).