IST! NEO ZAP! TECK Breakthrough ....

[JesterTerrestrial]

What do you mean by that?

When you have rediscovered the Aether then you can say you have catched up to Tesla :p. But you're getting close. You should join the herd at the energetic forum.

This is what I found in a quick search online for anyone interested. 

Tesla's aether concept

It is important to correctly comprehend Tesla's unique aether concept. The theory refers to an aether, but Tesla's aether is not analogous to classical aether theories. John J. O'Neill stated,

    "Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous ether, acted upon by the life giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance." (Grotz, 1997)
More...
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Tesla%27s_Dynamic_Theory_of_Gravity#Tesla.27s_aether_concept

Aether 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR5DZPjW_VU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTPUa8hL9f

WIRELESS RADIANT ENERGY TRANSMISSION - AN UNDERSTANDING OF TESLA's AETHER FLUID PUMP SYSTEM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvxcUQdrPF8

Luminiferous aether
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

*  The Aether - What is it?

          o Aether (sometimes colloquially shortened to ether) is an ancient concept dating back into antiquity. The spelling "Aether" is used to help avoid the inevitable confusion of its similarity to the chemical compound ether, thus the old saw, "Aether is the medium of space while ether is the gas that knocks you out". However, although it is technically incorrect, both spelling are currently used interchangeably.

            Thus, in its most basic form, aether is nothing more than a distributed physical medium permeating the entire universe, endowing it [space] with measurable physical qualities. Einstein readily acknowledged this when, in 1920 (See "Sidelights on Relativity", A. Einstein, Dover Edition 1983 Page 23), he said:

                  "… space is endowed with physical qualities;
                  in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether."

            It is more important to point out here what aether is not required to be. Aether is not a preferred reference frame (it could be, but isn't required to be). The specific properties of the aether are not defined, as should be clear, from the above basic definition. To be a preferred reference frame, the aether and matter must be assigned certain characteristics, which is encompassed by specific models of aether. It is these specific variations and conceptual models that, once defined, can be evaluated and tested.

            Contrary to popular myth, modern science isn't incompatible with, and does need, the aether concept. In fact, modern science could not be defined without incorporating some form of its definition into its foundation. Let's remember that the basic definition of aether is nothing more than a "physical medium permeating the entire universe, endowing it with measurable physical qualities". Currently, modern science uses the term "fields" or "fabric" instead of aether, since the term aether has become associated with a specific set of 19th century conceptual models considered to disproven and thus invalid.


    * Q-002: Does the Michelson-Morley Experiment (MMX) disprove aether theories?

          o The answer is no. What the famous Michelson-Morley Experiment showed us is that the assumption that one could use the aether frame as a preferred frame of reference in which to measure such things as motion, is invalid. This told us more about the physical qualities of matter and electromagnetic energy, than about proof of the presence, of lack thereof, of an aether. It clearly demonstrated our conceived notions about matter (at that time) and its interactions with the aether were incorrect. There have been several distinct experiments designed specifically to define the interaction of matter/EM energy with the underlying medium. Some of the more famous are:
more... http://www.mountainman.com.au/aeth_faq.htm

[Bennyboy]

@innovation_station

Nice work mate, very interesting.  I'm interested to see how you power a load off the amplified spark. 

How much else of this work do you intend to share with the forum, or do you intend to try and market the advanced tech that you are working on?

Either way, thanks for sharing thus far.

Ben.

[innovation_station]

the world must understand my basic stuff....   b4 my advanced stuff will be of any importance

my modules are 4 months away   meaning i am still designing it however i dont have to prove anything it is NATURE


ist!

yes time for a song....   HEAVENS TABLE...   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRsXUExNAmc

from the guy who stopped for the child in the street .....   to put a dollar in his hand for something to eat.....

not only angles sit at heavens table....

ist

peace and  eternal love!!

[infringer]

Nature?

What might be your example found within nature from which you come to this conclusion.

Is it a storm ? The rubbing of different layers of the atmosphere building charges to create an enormous power source or is a lightning something different the elements of a storm are pretty fundamental.

High pressure system moves in on low pressure pushing the low pressure further south then bingo the temperature increases and moisture gathers till the point it begins to dump on us. The only thing I do not quite understand is why snow storms do not bring lightning seeing as how they should be more dry... Is it the moisture that allows for this bolt of energy to travel to the ground causing a chain spark gap reaction? Or is the answer more simple like the cold does not allow for charge to build to a sufficient temperature much like the issue we find in batteries?

IST I really enjoy your post do not take this as yourself being criticized but, the only way for me to understand is thicker substance and if you would like a brisk transition to understanding of your years of work it will not happen without an in depth explanation! So what is it you want folks to comprehend tell them and they will choose weather to follow along or not.

Where is Sparks at I am shocked he has not jumped in on this discussion nor others like communication discussion...

-infringer-

[wattsup]

@infringer

magnet + power + sparks = thundercloud + friction + lightning

In cold weather the rain droplets cannot combine friction since they are being transformed into lighter snowflakes that will dissipate the friction to below the lightning critical levels.

But I have seen lightning in snow storms when the weather was much more humid then normal and clouds were dark greyish/blue. Pretty freaky.

@IST

Try it by sticking a metal plate over the magnet and spark on the metal plate. This may save your magnets. lol

Also, is there a difference with only 1 or 2 magnets and how are your magnets polarized. From what I can see, you have simply recreated a reed switch with magnet quenching, without the advantage of the vacuum of the reed switch containing the fusion potential.