"Free energy" and "Overunity" We need a definition.

[pauldude000]

No stranger than the rest of reality I presume.


That is an interesting conceptualization. I shall necessarily ponder the matter for awhile.


A thought to make you go 'hmmmm' ehhh? 


Paul Andrulis

[audiomaker]

No stranger than the rest of reality I presume.


That is an interesting conceptualization. I shall necessarily ponder the matter for awhile.


A thought to make you go 'hmmmm' ehhh? 


Paul Andrulis

It's definitely making me go "hmmm".

The problem is that when something is still in crayon in your head, you have to draw and explain it in crayon.  Examples in crayon don't lend to people taking them seriously

I definitely need a more elegant way of describing what I'm visualizing.

[Aman Shah]

There is no such thing as "free energy".
The only thing "free" would be that we don't pay money to use it.
Money has nothing to do with energy.

There is no overunity.
It is a nonsensical term created by those who want you to pay them for energy.

There are however, Unrecognized Sources of Energy (USE), and that is the point of this forum.

I contend two USEs are

1. The phenomenon of Resonance.
For example ... two similar tuning forks ring louder and longer than 1 when only 1 is struck.
or... an Acoustic Guitar is 1000 times louder than and Electric Guitar, same strings  same strum.

2. The phenomenon of Magnetic Permeability in Ferromagnetic Materials.
For example... a coil with an Iron core produces a Magnetic Field 5,000 times greater than just the coil for any given current. This is because the Iron has previously randomly oriented magnetic dipoles that line up with the magnetic field of the coil and ADD to the field of the coil.

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

I am glad that there are some people in this world who understand the reality.(I hope that you had read my previous comment.).I am working on an idea to invent a gravity powered engine,which is NOT a perpetual Motion Machine.

You will be surprised to know that even after giving proof of working analogy of my engine,people on several science online forums laugh and ban me,because of their false authorisationship that Gravity engines are always Perpetual and cannot work.

Best regards,Aman.

[pauldude000]

It's definitely making me go "hmmm".

The problem is that when something is still in crayon in your head, you have to draw and explain it in crayon.  Examples in crayon don't lend to people taking them seriously

I definitely need a more elegant way of describing what I'm visualizing.

There is only so much with which an individual may expect to achieve with the written or spoken word. A concept is not words in our mind, but an envisioning which itself must be translated into descriptive words. Much is always lost in translation due to the lack of flexibility and applicability of the available words which may be utilized.

[audiomaker]

There is only so much with which an individual may expect to achieve with the written or spoken word. A concept is not words in our mind, but an envisioning which itself must be translated into descriptive words. Much is always lost in translation due to the lack of flexibility and applicability of the available words which may be utilized.

That quote in itself is proof that some have a better set of crayons than others!  Nice