Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Feedback To Source

Started by nievesoliveras, December 21, 2008, 11:28:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Hi,

If you spread 7 coils with (360o / 7)o apart, you will get less cogging, and smoother run of the rotor as the 8 mangets on the disc will never pass all coils at the same time. Then you can also let all the coils be connected in series electrically, so you need only one rectifier.

I can make a drawing. But it's late now so I will see if I can do that tomorrow some time.

br.

Vidar

nievesoliveras

Quote from: Low-Q on February 25, 2009, 05:01:09 PM
Hi,

If you spread 7 coils with (360o / 7)o apart, you will get less cogging, and smoother run of the rotor as the 8 mangets on the disc will never pass all coils at the same time. Then you can also let all the coils be connected in series electrically, so you need only one rectifier.

I can make a drawing. But it's late now so I will see if I can do that tomorrow some time.

br.

Vidar

Thank you @lowq
You are welcome!

Jesus

Low-Q

A setup like this:

It is not as I previously said, but the main thing is to connect the coils in series. If you have the same timing on the coils, the voltage peak will be greater compared to the loss in the rectifier. This will enhance the efficiency related to voltage - so to speak. But remember that the current flowing through the coils will counterforce the rotation as you are trying to run something with this generator - according to Lenz law. This something is the motor running the flywheel, so the motor will get feedback from the coils, so the break will be reduced. The question is now: How much break is it compared to the energy supplied from the coils to the motor? If the motor determind this energy amount, as it is actually the motor that is supposed to run the flywheel, it is naturally to think that the losses through the coils, rectifier, friction and so on, will eventually halt the system. You never know before you try :)

Br.

Vidar

nievesoliveras

Quote from: Low-Q on February 26, 2009, 08:11:03 AM
A setup like this:

It is not as I previously said, but the main thing is to connect the coils in series. If you have th same timing on the coils, the voltage peak will be greater compared to the loss in the rectifier. This will enhance the efficiency related to voltage - so to speak.


That is a good possibility!
My question is: Will it not generate too much high voltage for just one rectifier to handle it?
I mean each coil in series could amplify the previous voltage.

Jesus

Mk1

@all

I personally think that only one bridge won't work, because the voltage has to go trough the other coils , and that will create back push in the other coils.