Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic "Free Energy" designs released - finally!

Started by PaulLowrance, January 17, 2009, 02:06:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinu

Someone needs to take a basic physics course (thermodynamics 101) before theoretically “validating” the results of no-matter-what simulations.

This thread is another big disappointment but no bigger than others. ;)
Ask for real proofs and watch out for empty words: your mind is about to be indoctrinated.

Sorry guys,
Good luck!

Ergo

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 21, 2009, 10:09:01 AM
Perhaps my mathematics is spot on.
No, I don't think so. You don't know all variables involved. Once you actually build the device
you will discover so many more variables that is affecting the final outcome.

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 21, 2009, 10:09:01 AM
The prediction made according to my diode mathematics was correct that diodes *must* rectify ambient thermal energy.
So far there is only your own claims on this. Until there is successful and independent replications I stay undecided.

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 21, 2009, 10:09:01 AM
For design #1, the mathematics is so simple and clear that I don't see how it could be incorrect.
It's clear to yourself in your own imaginary mathematical world.
I will stand by my opinion of you not really having covered all variables in your mathematics.
It's not very serious or clever to state OU by an homemade unverified formula without having any hardware.
I'm 100% sure you've got nothing going on here.

PaulLowrance

Quote from: Ergo on January 21, 2009, 12:10:40 PM
No, I don't think so. You don't know all variables involved. Once you actually build the device
you will discover so many more variables that is affecting the final outcome.
So far there is only your own claims on this. Until there is successful and independent replications I stay undecided.
It's clear to yourself in your own imaginary mathematical world.
I will stand by my opinion of you not really having covered all variables in your mathematics.
It's not very serious or clever to state OU by an homemade unverified formula without having any hardware.
I'm 100% sure you've got nothing going on here.


Quote from: tinu on January 21, 2009, 12:09:40 PM
Someone needs to take a basic physics course (thermodynamics 101) before theoretically “validating” the results of no-matter-what simulations.

This thread is another big disappointment but no bigger than others. ;)
Ask for real proofs and watch out for empty words: your mind is about to be indoctrinated.


Boy, the negs are sure out in full force. What does that mean?  ;D

PL

p.s., You're try to hard, negs.

PaulLowrance

BTW, Tom Schum has recently acknowledged that his 1N34A diode array measurements were conclusive in that the diode array produced a DC voltage, which is what I have been telling Tom. I told Tom the next step for his diode measurements would have been to take it to rural areas. I have taken my diode array to various rural areas, from inside mountains to between canyons, buried two feet in the ground with only the fiber optic cable coming out of the ground, all while contained in metal shielding, up to three layers metal shields (medium, large, extra large). For 13 months I have always measured a DC voltage on the diode array. A lot of the measurements were taken with the diode array inside an oil bath. I've used dozens of voltage meters. The diode array has produced up to 204uV DC.  :)

Also, an anonymous person on my forum has claimed to replicated my 156 diode array, and tested by their senior EE at the company he works for. They measured a clear DC voltage on an expensive Keithley voltage meter.

CMB claims his 1993 THz diode array produce 100mV in a metal shielded environment while inside an oil bath.

That's three for three confirmations, yet it's still being ignored. Is the "free energy" community being guided into fake designs?  There sure are a lot of people who find the need to spend time debunking. From day one of my research I have stated that I will not accept money donations and that my full intent is to help the world.


PL

PaulLowrance

[continued from previous post]

Small signal semiconductor modeling mathematics using the best know physics equations, which is based on quantum physics, clearly shows that diodes *must* rectify ambient thermal energy. Even the acclaimed genious, Mike Engelhardt, creator of the LTspice for the large corporation Linear Technology Inc, has said that I am correct that the mathematics shows diodes would rectify Johnson noise.

Has and is humanity being bamboozled, slight of hand guidance? Oh these people hate me with a passion. They can continue threatening me in private all they wish. I will never give up until I'm buried 6 feet under!

PL