Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[PaulLowrance]

The theory is about the relaxation time constant in a conductor. That theory is well stablished in conventional physics, maybe a little uncommon but that theory is explained in common physics.

In the project, I'm showing a way to extract pure voltage from the battery. Again, this "advantage" is based in the Relaxation Time theory, based in common physics. We know if we don't extract current from the battery, we will have an unlimited source of energy. Of course, there is a degradation of the battery in the Years, but we can replace the battery each 3 or 4 years and the problem will be resolved.

The voltage in a battery is infinite. So, I think the dipole is getting potential continously from somewhere and I think the potential comes from the vacuum. Maybe the potential comes from another source. But we know the voltage in a battery is infinite and we can extract all the voltage we want from the dipole without discharging the battery.

This quest is to capture pure voltage from the battery, not directly from the vacuum.

That's fine and good, but please see this from my point of view. Every time I post my research it seems that somehow it gets distracted. I'm using conventional mathematics the entire way in the entire step-by-step process for my design. FEMM is doing every step of my machine for the entire cycle, as the current increases, etc. etc., FEMM is considering everything, and the end results in FEMM shows extra energy. Can you show the same?  FEMM also does electric problems. Yes, relaxation is conventional physics, but that's light years away from covering all of your claims in your theory. You would need to go over every step in extreme detail using a numerical mathematical analysis software to see the results.

My point is, why have people work on an unproven theory when my research is complete, entirely based on conventional physics, and verified by one of the most well-established magnetics software, FEMM. Why would you say to everyone --> "Congratulations PL, but we need to develop more devices and techniques." I have taken my research as far as it can go in terms of conventional physics. Why have everyone start working on an unproven theory when I have already competed my research. It's now only a matter of time to tweak my Free Energy design #3 so the energy gain per cycle is greater than the losses in transistors and wire resistance.

PL

[Magnethos]

Paul,
All the theory you have explained it's correct, in theory. I think my theory or pseudo-theory it's correct too. But I think you haven't built the device yet. And I haven't built "my" device neither.

Nature hasn't read our physics text books. She can't adapt to us, we must adapt to her.
So the best thing we can do is to build our devices and test and see what really happens. Maybe we're discussing 2 big solutions and we're spending too much time discussing if your or my theory are ok or not.

So, as God said. Go and turn your words into facts. I will do it too.

[PaulLowrance]

I've verified the popular and well-established magnetics software, FEMM, with real measurements. So far it has been very accurate. Perhaps that's why it's called "conventional physics," because it's been heavily tested for decades under various conditions and proven to be accurate so far.

So a theory is not a theory. Some theories are rock solid to date-- conventional physics. Also, there's a big difference between writing down a lot of mathematics on paper, and using a well established numerical mathematical analysis software such as FEMM. Tom Bearden has tons of paper mathematics, and my hats off to Tom for trying, but that's not so impressive because it's untested. FEMM, on the other hand, is well tested.

Posting here is not always a waste of time. As I have FEMM sims running in the background, sometimes I'll come here in hopes that as many people as possible will copy my website that contains my designs and science. Nobody lives forever. If something happened to me, then I just cross my fingers *someone* will take my research to the final remaining few yards. So close!!!

PL

[newton2]

Hello Honoured Profiles and The Honoured Administrator of This The Honourable OU-Forum !
I am NOT a Physics Leviathan arising with my Elder Times Chalkboard & Formulas Pergament Rolls for to shout against NewTimes Novel Ideas.......though I kindly have to write this brief Comment :

##If present is a Serially connected Circuit of an IDEAL REGULAR PROPERTIES TYPES COIL ,
of an IDEAL REGULAR PROPERTIES TYPES CAPACITOR , of an IDEAL REGULAR EMF-DC-Source
capable of "letting" through AC-oscillatory Currents....................and a "Mechanical on/off-Switch".........though NOT any socalled Electronics Flyback-diode.....

THÉN WHEN SWITCHED-ON there are some "closely defined" Relations between the obtainable "Amplitudes"-Values for i.e. the Capacitor´s PEAK-Voltage , the Current(t) through Coil and related to the EMF-DC-Source´s Own "Supply-voltage"............a COMMON LC-serially-AC-oscillatory-"pendling" of ESTABLISHED U(t)-I(t)-values......THOUGH WHEN i.e. Switched-OFF at Current-Max through Coil , Thén an "arcing" in the SWitch-air-gap "short-while" forms letting the quickly-nullified-current i Coil be Charging-equivalently the Condenser to a Voltage DEPENDING on the LC-U(t)-I(t)-oscillatory-OFF-Time-Conditions (from the THEN PAST ON-Circuit).........!
If else NOT are any "connections"-reversal of Capacitor´s Wires or else of altered EMF-Source´s Voltage ,etc, THÉN there IS a specified IDEAL RELATIONS LIMIT of Voltages-built-up in the Capacitor !

Might I kindly soon briefly comment about the OTHER promoted discussions Theme : "Blocking-Oscillator to supply Blocking Oscillator......." !

WKR & have Yourselves a nice Day and Fruitfull Researching Results ! My kind Thanks about Your All important interesting Contributions to The Honourable Course of OU  !

[powercat]

I *will* have a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year. The mathematics is from well-established conventional physics. It is very clear. It matches my magnetic theory. I took my magnetic theory, made a design in FEMM, ran the sim, and FEMM numbers came back in agreement with my magnetic theory. It will work!

Thank's Paul
a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year

I Hope it's not another ROLL ON THE END OF   [year]  thread

Sorry but you remind me of a Politician
Your knowledge is far greater than mine and i am learning a lot  thanks

all the best in the future
cat