Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[NRGFromTheVacuum]

Here is my clip.
I used my magnet motor to charge my source cap...no batteries used at all.
Batteries are not balanced right anyway......they have more pos than neg in them mostly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km8zBsN41Ik

I'll just act as a neutral tester and you guy's can tell me what to do.
I have loads of equipment, caps, coils ect.
That way there can be no bias in the testing.

cheers
Scotty.

Great video, nice results you built the circuit perfectly.

Now you should try it with different coil configurations and capacitors, see what happens...

[scotty1]

I tried different coils and as i said earlier, I found that I get best results with low ohm coils.
Also, I noticed the rise time of the coil was important, meaning that if I matched the on pulse to the rise time of my coils I would get 300Volts in the load cap, but I would loose more than 1V on the source cap....so my setup would be better with less wire on the coils.
I tried other higher resistance coils but they only acted as a resistance and that was it.
I also used an old motor stator coil/ iron ring and that worked ok too.
Next I think I'll use the coils of my magnet motor, which are enclosed in a super strong magnetic field.
Maybe I can get an added back spike?
Scotty.

[PaulLowrance]

Here is my clip.
I used my magnet motor to charge my source cap...no batteries used at all.
Batteries are not balanced right anyway......they have more pos than neg in them mostly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km8zBsN41Ik

I'll just act as a neutral tester and you guy's can tell me what to do.
I have loads of equipment, caps, coils ect.
That way there can be no bias in the testing.

cheers
Scotty.

Scotty,

Just please make sure you measure the capacitance immediately after doing the spark experiment, and may as well measure the capacitance immediately before.

It's far more difficult to tap into the "free energy" than using such large wire laminated steel core than shown in that video, and it requires extremely fast pulsing that you just cannot get with sparks. The steel wire in the laminated core needs to be far less than 35mils.  35mils is very thin MIG wire, and even it's far too thick. Not sure what he's using in the video, but it's very thick stuff, like a good size nail.  "Free energy" is possible, but I'd bet the farm you'll get less than 100% efficiency if you take correct measurements.

PL

[capthook]

Out of all the present claims of developed & working "free energy" machines on this site, this seems to be the only valid one at the time.

So - you think this is a true working 'free energy machine'.
And the only one?
What about your diode array?  You're now saying that's not free energy.

It's the *only* way he's going to achieve "free energy," and that's exactly what he's using, a bifilar ferrite core.

But on closer inspection, you later determined it was NOT a bifilar coil - so, according to you, free energy in this example would be impossible.

I've answered all of the questions how to build a "free energy" machine at my website -->

You hype your site alot.  Are you in need of additional page views to ramp-up your ad fees?

I think there's going to be a lot of people out of monthly posting paychecks by end of 2009. By 2010 there will be no need for this website. 

So your 'discoveries' will kill this website?

At my website I just posted the Grand Magnetic Equation -->

http://globalfreeenergy.

How many plugs have you given for your website on THIS website?  Hundreds!!

For over one year I've had the first documented and properly tested "free energy" machine that includes the extreme details, including part #'s, to build.........
Make no mistake. My diode research is the thing of the past, and I *will* have a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year.....

So you've had proof of OU but it's just that no one will listen?  And another YEAR to actually build it?? 

My point is, why have people work on an unproven theory when my research is complete.
Why have everyone start working on an unproven theory when I have already competed my research. It's now only a matter of time to tweak my Free Energy design #3 so the energy gain per cycle is greater than the losses in transistors and wire resistance.

So, you're now saying:
'why are you meatheads trying such stupid stuff that's unproven when you should be working on my stuff that's ...ahem.. 'real'!!
And you don't have just ONE free energy design, but THREE??

So I'll say it again, my diode array is the first properly documented "free energy" generator that includes every detail to replicate.!

Yowza!  I guess there will be free energy machines in every household before you know it!  Quick, go to his site and learn how!

IMO there's nothing special here. Just either your large cap is far less than 7500uF (partially damaged), or the dielectric absorption is not being considered.

So - after all of you ....words... you are now giving your opinion that:
THERE"S NOTHING SPECIAL HERE.
Are you bi-polar, or did it just take you awhile to reverse your position?

"Free energy" is possible, but I'd bet the farm you'll get less than 100% efficiency if you take correct measurements.

From bashing the sceptics to becoming a sceptic yourself.  All within a few days.  Neato.

[PaulLowrance]

So - you think this is a true working 'free energy machine'.
And the only one?
What about your diode array?  You're now saying that's not free energy.

I was not referring to my own research. I could just imagine you saying, "Hello, anyone here. I guess nobody is here."  Gee, I guess you don't count yourself. You have some odd emotional logic.

But on closer inspection, you later determined it was NOT a bifilar coil - so, according to you, free energy in this example would be impossible.

Try reading. I never said that.

You hype your site alot.  Are you in need of additional page views to ramp-up your ad fees?

Get some glasses. I have never placed a single ad on any of my research websites.

So you've had proof of OU but it's just that no one will listen?  And another YEAR to actually build it??

I get a lot emails from interested people.

So - after all of you ....words... you are now giving your opinion that:
THERE"S NOTHING SPECIAL HERE.
Are you bi-polar, or did it just take you awhile to reverse your position?

From bashing the sceptics to becoming a sceptic yourself.  All within a few days.  Neato.

Why don't you wake up and perceive what took place. I was correcting incorrect claims, such as when someone claimed the cap would just immediately short out because of the "4 ohms" resistance. That's not the case because of inductance.

I have said from the start that it's either legit "free energy," or it's due to dielectric absorption, or due to damaged capacitor. Not once did I say it was a legit "free energy" machine. I have clearly taken the path of "truth seeking."  I gave the guy the chance-- being unbiased. After analyzing the claim, it is now my opinion it's not "free energy."  I guess that's too much for you to grasp all at once? 


PL