ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Tito L. Oracion]

This thread should be deleted. There are other free energy replications out there. If u keep on following this thread, you will keep on getting misled that an ordinary capacitor will discharge and give u free energy, not only that; and power heavy load.

I think you also delete the discoveries of tesla.


cause i just shared what tesla had discovered.


If you are really irritated with my works but you want to proceed following it, just scratch your head then proceed.




otits 

[Tito L. Oracion]

Teets said YES.     But with a 'twist'.    

Come on TITO. Oooo bop.  Lets do oo the twist. Oooo bop bop. Come on TI TO. Oooo bop. Lets do do the twist.  Oooo bop bop.

The only thing I can figure is to use the Igniter pat where the cap discharges into a primary that is bifi.

Another thing Im going to try is just letting collapse current from a coil dump direct to the bifi, as its capacitance will accept the dump, but a normal coil wont accept it. I think both should be tried. From the 'coil for electromagnets' pat, he declares that higher voltage more effect, something like that.

I have some SIDACs ( like a solid state spark gap) that break over at 230v. Im going to try those with my Radioshack pocket inverter. 250v ac peak from 2 AA. 160v on recommended load(electroluminecent light strips)

I used it on my Lasersaber motor replication. Can charge 10uf pretty fast. So Ill have it load a cap to about 160v, then an inductor in series with a diode, from that cap to charge a smaller cap. When the smaller cap goes to 230v, it discharges to the bifi.  Something like that.

I found the pat while searching one day. Tito had posted about it much earlier than me, as he posted so after I posted on it.  It talks about gaining efficiency compared to holding 12v or 6v across the spark coil primary till the points open as more standard vehicles had. Now with ECM/ECU control the spark coils, with proper coil design the on time is short, then off, SPARK.   But if you look at a standard points system, there is a cap across the points/switch. Without that cap, the spark is short and weak. But with the cap across the switch, we get oscillation with the coil primary, cap and 'battery' in a series loop when the switch across the cap opens.  Its not capacitor discharge into the primary, like the Igniter pat, but there is oscilation and you can 'visually' see a longer lasting spark output due to the oscillation, something we dont get from a normal transformer.    I havnt seen any tests out there to check the efficiency of this oscillation compared to just the spark coil alone. Something else I have to get into.

When I read the pat and where it refers to more efficiency, I assumed OU. I didnt consider the huge 'inefficiency' of the old method at the time. But with a Twist, there may be something to it.

Mags

I actually told the twist to study and that is the spark gap.

[totoalas]

Flux capacitor self charger  YT

otits and all

Merry Xmas 

[d3x0r]

Although there is another option, which scenario do you think is happening

On the first phase, ground satisfies both high potentials...

[Dave45]

On the first phase, ground satisfies both high potentials...

Hmm I see, thats the classic conventional view, positive is only a very low negative potential.
So bemf is a deficient of negative electrons and not a positive flow of positrons.

Oh I forgot the best one so I had to come back, voltage is pressure and current is flow