ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[profitis]

"gambling losses"

gains

[web000x]

In my own defense, the harping was more about the significance of the relations between three coils....this more so than the necessity for three coils....  It should be obvious how they are "physically" related....do we have more than two options...?  I hope you don't mind my saying, in my opinion, your thinking is in the right place, however, your questions are still too generic, too general.....  If possible focus on "interactions" between coils rather than physical relations....


There are people on this platform who have experimented with multifilar coils....none of them have demonstrated what I have shown you in our offline discussions....what are they missing......




Regards

Is the multifilar coil to be arranged as the constituent coils in Tesla's ozone patent circuit?  With the coils being switched between magnetic conjunction and opposition?  This would give that impedance mismatch of which you've spoken..


I have experimented with various arrangements using opposition charging and conjunction discharging to run a motor.  You can see a jacknoskills inspired circuit that I experimented with a few months ago using the opposing end of the third winding as a source of high potential.  Although you mentioned in a post a while back that during cap charging, the motor would spin.  This didn't happen in the arrangement I was experimenting with.  However, using the correct configuration, I could in a similar manner cause conjunction charging and opposition discharging just by making a few adjustments, thus causing motoring force during cap charging.


I have no idea if I have been searching in the right direction but I figured I'd throw this out there so you can either completely destroy it or encourage it.


Thanks,


Dave

[profitis]

"The latter task is
impossible if the prior was not successfully
accomplished."

Not if ur lucky

[that_prophet]

Multiplying Free Energy is super simple with this GEM-(Geometrical Electricity Multiplier=AC type) free electricity multiplying mechanism at http://free-energy.yolasite.com/. This is a device that can be easily + cheaply assembled by using one large pulley attached to a DC motor, + at least one mini-pulley connected to an AC generator, both must be of the same voltage, 4 diodes to build a crude full wave bridge rectifier-(converts your AC output into DC input that your drive motor needs), a lot of wire to connect your electrical components together, and a belt, strap or tied piece of rope or string, to connect the two or more pulleys together. This has to be dirt simple + cheap to build, as it will be needed to be built by the Tribulation Saints, whom cannot buy or sell.
-
This works on the simplest of principles, the principles of basic preschool pulley mechanics, where you only have to pay the small amount of electricity,(only a spark) that it takes to gain one single rotation of a DC motor, with a large 100 cm circumference pulley attached to it. With this one rotation of a large pulley, you can freely gain a long length of 100 cm of moving belt, which will give you a multiple of 100 rotations, for your one, or as many 1 cm circumference mini-pulleys that you wish to attach to this same belt. Then all that you would have to do is, attach AC generators to as many of these mini-pulleys that you choose to attach to the same belt as your large 100 cm pulley, which is attached to a DC drive motor.
-
You could even freely gain 1000 cycles of AC electricity from this single burst of DC current, if you chose to attach 10 mini-pulleys to the same belt/strap, with AC generators. Please don't listen to these fake worries about torque being a problem, as these mini-pulleys would run free of any torque, as torque comes from when you need to generate power. Power is calculated by multiplying voltage time current, and although your many rotations of these mini-pulleys are generating massive voltage, which is exactly what you need to crank over your DC drive motor the one single time, you are in need of only one mere spark of current. So, even massive amounts of voltage, when it is multiplied by the almost zero amount of current that it takes to rotate a DC motor once, it would equal out to practically zero power, cost practically zero torque. 

[citfta]

As I explained in my last post in that thread I don't really consider it the same as THE "Zero Force Motor" as I have not even watched any of  the videos about that motor or read the book.  I originally posted the video to show Bro. Mikey he was wrong about a motor with air coils running away because of no BEMF.  I was then asked by Aaron if I would be willing to share more about what I was doing.  So after a few days of consideration I decided to share some of what I was up to.  I didn't share some other ideas I have for power and generating coils.  Those are not for a group of people that won't even try to replicate correctly what someone takes time to show them.

Thanks for all your hints and suggestions.  I am still trying to learn and feel I have a long way to go to get even close to where I want to be.

Kind regards,
Carroll