ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[ramset]

Well
Tito,I see lots of power is required in your movies,Sort of like what we need in this world right now,
Lots of power!

Perhaps you don't pray for wisdom or "Signs" ?
If I had what you claim to have,The very Least I would do is Pray !
And the "signs" of the last years,they couldn't be more obvious!
You are gonna look and feel awfully silly [at the very least]at the pearly gates.
Your becoming more and more like a bad Joke!

Not Funny..................
Chet
PS
As Mags has hinted to,
Did it ever occur to you that the beginning of a 1000 year reign would need some free energy??
Stop holding up the works!!

[Qwert]

Tito, I recommend you the very first post of this link. But you must read it VERY CAREFULY, since it passed two years already. Two years is a lot of time, for some people at least.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6944.msg161234#msg161234

[forest]

I believe I have cracked one tip : how to efficiently use source . Small step but anyway.
Think about two situations :
1. You connect bulb across battery terminals. This is not good. Shorting dipole make chemical reaction inside battery which is against dipole.
2. You connect two batteries by negative terminals (presumably good grounded).One battery has to have twice the voltage of the first one.
Then put load between positive terminals of two batteries. Now dipole while shorting or rather balancing make a current flow to the first battery.

Of course we not always use batteries. Just make a little twist.

Is that correct way Tito ?

[petersone]

Hi Bill,MrMags,and All
In a normal genny the coil and rotor have a straight 1-1 relationship,more juice=more drag,less juice=less drag,correct? In this setup are saying that is not the case? but that's not what I'm seeing for some reason,I'm seeing more juice from the rotor coil,for which I am paying,but the 1-1 relationship is maintained,so,were am I paying for the juice from the fixed coil? I probably am paying for it,but I don't know where.
peter

[Tito L. Oracion]

I believe I have cracked one tip : how to efficiently use source . Small step but anyway.
Think about two situations :
1. You connect bulb across battery terminals. This is not good. Shorting dipole make chemical reaction inside battery which is against dipole.
2. You connect two batteries by negative terminals (presumably good grounded).One battery has to have twice the voltage of the first one.
Then put load between positive terminals of two batteries. Now dipole while shorting or rather balancing make a current flow to the first battery.

Of course we not always use batteries. Just make a little twist.

Is that correct way Tito ?

That is one of many ways actually, you are correct 
Bearden has also other way and i also made or discover other way by much the same way as tesla switch.
and if you can convert it in transistor then its the best and small.

ps:Here is the new way i made, i used input and the effect of the input witch is the output and redirect it into a normal power amplification method then put it back the input and the output into the source. and that i believe the most efficient way using input co'z the input we used made an output and the effect of the input into all output to itself. guzzzh very hard to express really.     

@qwert
           sorry, but what exactly you mean? 

ohh, i think i got it, i said that just to see if they will share their free devices but unfortunately as you see no one gave, their too greedy.