Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 120 Guests are viewing this topic.

Reiyuki

Quote from: stupify12 on May 17, 2014, 10:46:20 AM
This is the most interesting observation to pursue. How can we let the Resonance ring and drain power from it without disturbing the Resonance? That is the good question people should think carefully and wisely.

Parallel resonance seems to be good at 'ringing', sloshing power back and forth between capacitor and inductor.

Series resonance seems to be good at efficiently moving power across distance.  (essentially a transmission line)


  So, lets make a hypothetical circuit off that:
We create a parallel and series resonant circuit with inductors on a shared transformer core, then tune both to identical frequency (but 180deg phase shifted?).  We then harvest some gain from the series capacitor.

  It would be tricky because the load would affect inductance and frequency.  But it does resemble several of Tesla's designs.  Bifilar would be good because it would cancel/preserve inductance and provide some builtin capacitance at the same time.

forest

Jeg, Bob


I think stupify12 get it right. It can be called electrostatic induction, but for me the basic thing is oscillator ringing continously.
That't the same for sure - when you can arrange circuit to become free without loading resistance then it acts as electrostatic induction. Now I want you to find radiant energy patent by Tesla ,read it and then find patent GB11293 and compare last picture and read this patent to see what is electrostatic induction , what is radiant energy.

weizisky

Quote from: forest on May 17, 2014, 04:43:22 AM
The problem with resonant circuit as I fight with is that only special ratio of inductance to resistance can allow energy accumulation or stable preservation in tank circuit. Most of other are damped oscillations (ring down). If you connect any load it adds resistance killing resonant rise effect. If you add power source connection you kill resonance in between your pumping impulses due to long wires acting as transmission lines dissipating energy in form of radio or heat waves.It is the reason of propoer design of pulse transformers or the circuit HF can be easily seen on DC power lines (thuse some oscillators have a chokes on input power line).

Forest and Bob buddies
1, resonant circuit is not necessary, if you want keep a resonant wave, the aim is to reuse it to amplify the energy. otherwise just to collect the energy totally. for example, Bedini only use every input inpulse to amplify energy and then to collect the amplified energy, He nerver care about how long the ring wave last.
2, if you use a Tesla's resonant circuit to amplify energy, make the resistance as low as possible is oky, dont care about the rtio. As you want to reuse the resonant wave , so you only can take some energy for output at it's HV point. at this point ,any load can be use as you like.

Maybe Tesla coil is not easy to understand.

WEIZI

Bob Smith

Quote from: Reiyuki on May 17, 2014, 11:05:08 AM
Parallel resonance seems to be good at 'ringing', sloshing power back and forth between capacitor and inductor.

Series resonance seems to be good at efficiently moving power across distance.  (essentially a transmission line)

  So, lets make a hypothetical circuit off that:
We create a parallel and series resonant circuit with inductors on a shared transformer core, then tune both to identical frequency (but 180deg phase shifted?).  We then harvest some gain from the series capacitor.

  It would be tricky because the load would affect inductance and frequency.  But it does resemble several of Tesla's designs.  Bifilar would be good because it would cancel/preserve inductance and provide some builtin capacitance at the same time.
What if you took one of Dave45's recent diagrams and added an AV plug after his parallel capacitors, followed by 2 or 3 caps in series.   Would this help?
Or wouldn't another way be to use of a strategically placed diode between parallel caps?  Just trying to think outside the box.
Bob

Bob Smith

Quote from: weizisky on May 17, 2014, 12:55:53 PM
Forest and Bob buddies
1, resonant circuit is not necessary, if you want keep a resonant wave, the aim is to reuse it to amplify the energy. otherwise just to collect the energy totally. for example, Bedini only use every input inpulse to amplify energy and then to collect the amplified energy, He nerver care about how long the ring wave last.
2, if you use a Tesla's resonant circuit to amplify energy, make the resistance as low as possible is oky, dont care about the rtio. As you want to reuse the resonant wave , so you only can take some energy for output at it's HV point. at this point ,any load can be use as you like.

Maybe Tesla coil is not easy to understand.

WEIZI
@WEIZI:  I'm researching as much as I can to try to understand your post. It will take me a little while...  Meanwhile, I've found this article that has some related info at the end, but I need to read more. http://www.cd3wd.com/cd3wd_40/cd3wd/APPRTECH/PA03NE/EN/B1167_6.HTM
Any further links or info you can provide are appreciated.
Bob