ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Tito L. Oracion]

Hi Teets
Interesting comment about the Americium.  Not absolutely necessary, but as an ionizing agent, I think it would help with the antenna portion. Then the rest is about collection, step up, step down and storage. But this is only one way, as I see it.
Hope you are well.
Bob

Yes, you are correct.
actually we can also use it in a simple circuit scheme, just make a spot for it to be use as a simple current source.

and i'm currently very well buddy, thank you, i have currently beaten my asthma, glory to Jesus


God bless you


mr.  T - 2   

[Leely]

Yes, you are correct.
actually we can also use it in a simple circuit scheme, just make a spot for it to be use as a simple current source.

and i'm currently very well buddy, thank you, i have currently beaten my asthma, glory to Jesus


God bless you


mr.  T - 2   

In other words, we need high voltage and current source?

[nelsonrochaa]

Nelsonrochaa!
I respect what you're doing
It is important for energy-efficient equipment development.
It's a good goal !!
But it is impossible to go over 100%.
who says he's lying.

Hi , idegen,
Energy is not destroyed is transformed ,  and energy is abundant. power is another thing.
What you maybe try to say is in the actual model of working of electricity, is impossible achieve even the COP1 because the power is dissipated or "lost" in another form of energy in load. Yes its right ! you can not put 1 unit of energy and output 5 of energy.
But you can input 1 unity of energy and output 2 units of power or even more . It will depend how how you convert the energy in power .
We have lots of commercial ways of convert energy in power , like solar panels, dynamos , batteries and so on , and you will agree with me that there are Converters more effective than others. price vs power production.
I'm not here trying to convince anyone of anything.
Current laws were created by the work and effort over the years, and can not be neglected.
We can not jeopardize people's knowledge and his work, however many of these rules prevail from the time it was formulated, and agree with me that will be safe to say that over the years some of these rules have been revised due to new discoveries .
It is also important to note that science is evolutionary, and "barriers" and doubt during this search process knowledge is supposed to exist.
I understand that the logical it may seem illogical at times, but we must not therefore to stop questioning us when something is atypical.
What I see most often are not critical, but certainties almost insurmountable for people who look like walking encyclopedias.
You think that helps most visitors and curious that research in this area? Or is this just for an elite minority?
When people think they already know everything and has nothing more to learn, they are in a bad way ......
 

[lancaIV]

By transmutation from cristalin to amorph metal ?
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=DE&NR=3601309A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19870723&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

Catching the energy from Valenz-electrons as thermo(phonon)-/photo(n)-electric converter do ?

wamr
        OCWL

[nelsonrochaa]

By transmutation from cristalin to amorph metal ?
Catching the energy from Valenz-electrons as thermo(phonon)-/photo(n)-electric converter do ?

wamr
        OCWL

Hi , LancaIV

Well seems good theme to discuss , but clearly is not a subject to everyone and you now that
But i now what you try "scratch" .  Yes the ionic process is not considered in actual rules  when we talk in electricity , only electrons lol Valenz-electrons as thermo(phonon)-/photo(n)-electric = "free" induction