ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[lancaIV]

Mister Nelson,I do not "now" but I think that I "know" (Knowledge) something
(Pardon for the correction,especially frome somebody who is not an englishman,saxonic/german is my fatherlanguage,portuguese my motherlanguage and myself-language normally french/arabic,unused )

There is not the search for an energy amplification(= material enrichment by weight ) nor power amplification but the search for a pressure source normally based by the so called Lorentz force !
Einsteins and Teslas work are energy decay related (down to the entrophy stadium).

e=mc² is the decay formulation based by the transitition from M1 to M2 with the result m

              There is the existance from light pressure/force ~ionic force=wind .

We are working with "time tools",each Hertzian oscillation=2 pulses (EMP,this nuclear pulse also divided),this has to be calculated in the nm-space by transformation step-up or step-down
Hz/KHz/MHz/THz-modulation and absorber/receiver/emissor material.

Converter as transformators are today mostly the trans(res)istors,
beside the kind of photoelectric transistor also called solar or thermionic cells
now magnetic-transistors ,especially equipped with superconductive magnets ~ MEG.

[forest]

it doesn't matter power or energy ! if there is external energy or external force field and it is used properly then energy or power is multiplied - no difference like Don Smith said - it's all the same except various definitions created
at least however if you look at power there is no law of conservation of power , so you can do whatever you wish to

[nelsonrochaa]

Mister Nelson,I do not "now" but I think that I "know" (Knowledge) something
(Pardon for the correction,especially frome somebody who is not an englishman,saxonic/german is my fatherlanguage,portuguese my motherlanguage and myself-language normally french/arabic,unused )

There is not the search for an energy amplification(= material enrichment by weight ) nor power amplification but the search for a pressure source normally based by the so called Lorentz force !
Einsteins and Teslas work are energy decay related (down to the entrophy stadium).

e=mc² is the decay formulation based by the transitition from M1 to M2 with the result m

              There is the existance from light pressure/force ~ionic force=wind .

We are working with "time tools",each Hertzian oscillation=2 pulses (EMP,this nuclear pulse also divided),this has to be calculated in the nm-space by transformation step-up or step-down
Hz/KHz/MHz/THz-modulation and absorber/receiver/emissor material.

Converter as transformators are today mostly the trans(res)istors,
beside the kind of photoelectric transistor also called solar or thermionic cells
now magnetic-transistors ,especially equipped with superconductive magnets ~ MEG.

Hi , i did not refer to you ! I just say this is a difficult theme for discuss with the most people in forum because their complexity even for me, but its interesting .
About the English , not worry my english such   , im Portuguese too i will understand.

Free photon can carry light and electromagnetic radiation .
If you have many photons but out of sync, and where one of them has a positive  some other will be negative, and they cancel out.
Assuming it were valid,  If you are shooting  one by one photon,  then you will register a negative current.
the nature of this current is reactive ?
I'm not the right person to talk about this subject
But interesting approach  

Thanks

[lancaIV]

                      Synthizising the natural partly universal process in an artificial manner !?

                                 How fast is an atomic spin ? RPM
                                 From which viewpoint ? Core/Nucleus or outside ?

                     A "solar" commercial mono-cristalin cell from the 80' transformed +/- 6%
                     from incident unfocussed natural light energy per sqm ! bandgap !
                                                      Right ?

                    Heat wave light is mostly in the near IR-range  !
                    This is an unvisible (for humans) radiation !
                     
                   Which temperature( heat= Brownian movement/fluctuation/oszillation effect)
                                                     has this light ?
                                          http://www.astrofoil.net/
                 http://www.astrofoil.net/astrofoil.insulation.r-values.html

                Citation: " All objects emit ? ? ?  by an object ." an actio/reactio-process description

                             basic search: the collider principle

[nelsonrochaa]

                      Synthizising the natural partly universal process in an artificial manner !?

                                 How fast is an atomic spin ? RPM
                                 From which viewpoint ? Core/Nucleus or outside ?

                     A "solar" commercial mono-cristalin cell from the 80' transformed +/- 6%
                     from incident unfocussed natural light energy per sqm ! bandgap !
                                                      Right ?

                    Heat wave light is mostly in the near IR-range  !
                    This is an unvisible (for humans) radiation !
                     
                   Which temperature( heat= Brownian movement/fluctuation/oszillation effect)
                                                     has this light ?
                                          http://www.astrofoil.net/
                 http://www.astrofoil.net/astrofoil.insulation.r-values.html

                Citation: " All objects emit .......

Thanks for the information .
Do you think there is any relationship to Kapanadze has not authorized filming their circuit with an IR camera?