ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[NickZ]

  Try some energy amplification coils, on for size. I hear they can even make hair grow back.
  Tito knows... but he won't show them to you.   Well, maybe some day...
 

[Spilled Fluids]

  Try some energy amplification coils, on for size. I hear they can even make hair grow back.
  Tito knows... but he won't show them to you.   Well, maybe some day...

Sadly, as much as people want coils and other devices to amplify energy; there is no such thing. None have been demonstrated and none will ever be demonstrated.
There is simply no getting around the laws of conservation of energy.

[NickZ]

  Ok, thanks for the info. Sorry, I'm in the wrong thread. Was looking for OU in all the wrong places.

[Spilled Fluids]

  Ok, thanks for the info. Sorry, I'm in the wrong thread. Was looking for OU in all the wrong places.

Actually, there are no 'right' places to look for it either.
Over Unity as in creating energy is not possible.
The very best we can do is to improve the efficiency of existing systems or finding new ways of extracting energy that does not violate the conservation of energy.
There always has to be a flow and in the end, the sources of those flows will always meet the rigours of conservation of energy.

[MarkE]

  Mark.E:
  Well, if videos, movies, and the many available books on the subject of ESP, etz...are not very credible as proof of anything to you. And clinical reports, aren't either. Then, you do have a problem, which I'm not going to try and resolve, or advice on.
  And since you don't even have the time, to watch the movie that I posted, nor are aware of the points that I'm trying to make, I see no point to carry on.

  There has been no one claiming the OverUnity prize, and that has won it , either.  So... what does that mean?

I have explained to you several times now that what is required is objective proof.  I have asked you for such proof.  You don't happen to have any.  You insist both that you are not trying to convince me, yet you keep throwing up one anecdote after another and complaining that I don't accept anecdotes as proof.  Your cite of Uri Geller as an example could not be worse.  If you really want to keep hammering away at this, we can go on as long as you have the stamina.

No one claiming the OU prize suggests that there aren't very many if any OU devices out there that could claim it.  As with the Randi paranormal prize it is evidence, not proof.