ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[that_prophet]

Here is GEM =a simple free energy technology for the Tribulation Saints
((( NEWS of this ancient technology will change the world )))
http://free-energy.yolasite.com/
-
I have the MOST IMPORTANT NEWS
To share with you + this whole world. Unfortunately this NEWS has two sides to it, one side is the best, most awesome God Given Gift, and the other side is the most horribly scary kind of news. THIS BEST NEWS is that FREE ENERGY is easy to produced, and can + will even lead to anti-gravity. Yes, that's right, this GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication) technology will eventually lead us to a way of defeating + repelling gravity. PROOF = this tech is found in our Holy Bible, (Ezekiel 1:16- where it is describing the appearance of a working UFO motor)
-
This FREE ENERGY technology is so simple to explain + build + use, you will wonder how it has not been discovered earlier=(evil forces were + are hiding this free energy technology). With this super simple technology, you only have to put one spark of DC electricity into this GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplier) mechanism, to get a return of 100's or even 1000's of units/cycles of AC electricity. That is because you only need to rotate your DC drive motor once,(costing only one spark of DC current) with a 100cm circumference pulley attached. This large pulley is attached to a long belt, strap, rope, or even string,(in a pinch) strapped around your 100cm pulley + 10 mini-pulleys with only 1cm circumferences, + each mini-pulley has an AC generator attached to it. This GEM of a mechanism runs by converting the 10 X100 = 1000 units/cycles of AC electricity = duel sparks, into much more than the one single spark of DC electricity that you need to power your drive motor, by using full wave bridge rectifiers. (one for each of the AC generators)
-
This free energy technology works by only having to put one spark of DC electricity in, which can return you 1000's of spark cycles, or units of AC electricity out. It's truly that simple, you are seemingly breaking the laws of thermodynamics, by using many small pulleys to multiply your total # of rotations, which you can easily convert into AC electricity. These AC generators run practically free of any torque, as you only need to produce one spark of DC current, (practically zero current) + torque is caused by producing power, which is P=IV, or Amps=current multiplied by Voltage, and massive voltage times practically zero current, still equals practically zero power=torque. Then by using full wave bridge rectifiers, you can also easily convert your AC electricity into a lot more than the one spark of DC current, that you need to keep this GEM of a free energy mechanism running = producing a lot more than is needed to be self powering.
http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/
-
This technology is in the Holy Bible = in Ezekiel 1:16 where he is describing what a UFO motor looks like while it's running so this technology will eventually lead us to anti-gravity as well as not only speeds approaching the speed of light but also the ability to do 1000 kph vectoring
-
I have already had one person confirm that this GEM technology does indeed work, as he said that he built three different versions of this free energy technology, that do indeed work. He was worried about the rumors that anyone who actually built a working free energy mechanism was soon after found dead. So, because he feared for his life, as well as the lives of his family, he asked me to not give out his name, or the fact that he had built three working versions of this GEM, free energy technology.
-

[leonelogb]

Dear Wattup

I'm Happy see you again around here, because I would like if you want please, explain what is it missed in this Fig. (Tesla Project thread) Because I have read  until end and I tried different kind of connection but just the battery doesn't discharge. What is it missed please Sr.

http://overunity.com/3972/the-tesla-project/330/#.WIAr9Yfmr5o

Why the inductor in series with the diode??  In my experience, discharging an inductor into an inductor doesnt work well. The collapsing inductor will collapse so fast that the other inductor will impede the current rush.  This is if im seeing the circuit right...

Mags

Dear Mags maybe we are missed something because Sr. Wattsup look Very happy with this circuit

http://overunity.com/6763/energy-amplification/msg497516/#msg497516

[web000x]

I don't know what akula is doing, and really don't care, not sure anyone should, but to each his own right...  Can't shake that two tank thing....  when I think of two tanks.....oscillating.... I get this visual of a ping pong match, the players are masters, and are  using two ping pong balls.  The balls take on the shape of wave packets...you know....beat packets....  the impedance is free to slide without limit around the board, free to intercept and redirect either or both of the wave packets.....

Is this what you are doing with your pulsed DC machines?  For your suggested 3 coil scenario, are your reactors in  place to be the beat generators? 


Dave

[web000x]

I'd like to think that this is what is taking place in one of my machines.  However, as I am no authority on the subject, nor do I care for "proper measurement", I cannot say that it is what's taking place with any certainty.




Three coil scenario...  Do you comprehend what was being suggested?


Reactors have nothing to do with the three coil scenario. 


Beat frequency generation is a subject of its own, I tried offering this to the community before but was ignored when the authorities stepped in and took over the discussion.   


Regards

You made a brief  video a while ago showing two transformers and a motor/generator coil in the same circuit (I assume) where you inverted Lenz.  Can you  elaborate on how this has nothing to do with the three coil scenario that you suggested?  I was under the impression that there were  similarities...


I am having an internal struggle of whether I should bias  my reactors with diodes or capacitors to 'bias it from the pulse'.  Capacitors help create great beats in the circuit ..


Dave

[wattsup]

Dear Wattup
I'm Happy see you again around here, because I would like if you want please, explain what is it missed in this Fig. (Tesla Project thread) Because I have read  until end and I tried different kind of connection but just the battery doesn't discharge. What is it missed please Sr.
http://overunity.com/3972/the-tesla-project/330/#.WIAr9Yfmr5o
http://overunity.com/6763/energy-amplification/msg497516/#msg497516

@leonelogb

The diagram you show was to test out the basic set-up of the Tesla Ozone Patent going back several years.
Let me look at it closer again since it's been a while.

I had put some pictures here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Wattsups'%20stuff/erfinder%20challenge/

Just be careful with where you put your hands/fingers because I did get several good shocks
during theses tests.

But the main point is if I were to redo these today, I would not do it the same way. Of course
it's been a few years since then and we have learned more and more but I still feel the TOP to
be the best way to drive a working primary but with a few changes.

What is missing is the pulsing medium does not last if it is not done EXACTLY like Tesla's patent
because in his patent, the make/break of the circuit being the shorting of the source battery
across the commutator of the high induction fan motor will work better then regular isolated
make/breaks because the motor inductor will act like a "shock absorber" to attenuate the
stress of each contact. The ideal contactor would be a rotary contact that is in a vacuum but I
have never found anything like that. Anyone that can make such a device would surely find a
good demand in the R&D sector.

@all

OK, let's just look at one other thing on the Tesla Patent device or any other battery driven OU
device, the battery. If you use a battery in your OU device and the device is designed to keep
the system running while the battery is being recharged continuously by the system itself, then
you guys need to remember and never forget one point. If you try and recharge a battery, let's
say a 12vdc 10 amp rated battery, that battery will never take more then 20% of the amp rating
as recharge. Any more and it is wasted. So your device should not consume more then 20%
of the rated amperage of the battery. In this case, you should not consume more then 2 amps
with a 10 amp battery if you want to put that energy back in the battery. So if you need 4 amps
to run your device with such a battery, it will never work with only one battery. You will need
two batteries in parallel so that 4 amps can return to the battery pack and not be wasted. This
should be your first rule to follow. You build a device, you supply it with power and see how
much power you need to be to run the device, you measure the amperage drawn from the
battery source and make sure it is not more then 20% of the battery amp rating. If you are
using more then that, you need to add as many more batteries in parallel as required for the
device amp consumption to be not more then 20% of the total amps of the battery pack.

This can be controlled via a variable resistor placed after the battery and adjusted by looking
at an inline amp meter to adjust the amps consumption to not more then 20%.
That is where to START.

wattsup

Added: I forced the text lines to be shorter given that large posted image above.