Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
You also can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

@ Erfinder. I have a few, maybe dumb questions:
How is it possible to design a device that appearently violate physics?
What physical theory is used to achieve such design?
How come you didn't stop for a while, thinking, "how do I violate physics using common physics"?


Br. Vidar

leonelogb


Thank you very much Sir, for answering me and thank you for the advice about of safety because I have already get me shock even with my rubber glove  :), Now I'll to try again in order to get the same effect than you, I hope ::). Thank W. 8)

Quote from: wattsup on January 19, 2017, 08:43:35 AM
@leonelogb

The diagram you show was to test out the basic set-up of the Tesla Ozone Patent going back several years. Let me look at it closer again since it's been a while.

I had put some pictures here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Wattsups'%20stuff/erfinder%20challenge/

Just be careful with where you put your hands/fingers because I did get several good shocks during theses tests.

But the main point is if I were to redo these today, I would not do it the same way. Of course it's been a few years since then and we have learned more and more but I still feel the TOP to be the best way to drive a working primary but with a few changes.

What is missing is the pulsing medium does not last if it is not done EXACTLY like Tesla's patent because in his patent, the make/break of the circuit being the shorting of the source battery across the commutator of the high induction fan motor will work better then regular isolated make/breaks because the motor inductor will act like a "shock absorber" to attenuate the stress of each contact. The ideal contactor would be a rotary contact that is in a vacuum but I have never found anything like that. Anyone that can make such a device would surely find a good demand in the R&D sector.

@all

OK, let's just look at one other thing on the Tesla Patent device or any other battery driven OU device, the battery. If you use a battery in your OU device and the device is designed to keep the system running while the battery is being recharged continuously by the system itself, then you guys need to remember and never forget one point. If you try and recharge a battery, let's say a 12vdc 10 amp rated battery, that battery will never take more then 20% of the amp rating as recharge. Any more and it is wasted. So your device should not consume more then 20% of the rated amperage of the battery. In this case, you should not consume more then 2 amps with a 10 amp battery if you want to put that energy back in the battery. So if you need 4 amps to run your device with such a battery, it will never work with only one battery. You will need two batteries in parallel so that 4 amps can return to the battery pack and not be wasted. This should be your first rule to follow. You build a device, you supply it with power and see how much power you need to be to run the device, you measure the amperage drawn from the battery source and make sure it is not more then 20% of the battery amp rating. If you are using more then that, you need to add as many more batteries in parallel as required for the device amp consumption to be not more then 20% of the total amps of the battery pack.

This can be controlled via a variable resistor placed after the battery and adjusted by looking at an inline amp meter to adjust the amps consumption to not more then 20%. That is where to START.

wattsup

   

web000x

Quote from: Erfinder on January 19, 2017, 07:42:07 AM

I made a video that was ignored, and when it wasn't ignored it was ridiculed, so yeah....I took it down.  Make no assumptions about what I have shared, I am the source, no one else has demonstrated what I have, in the manner that I have.  The transformers, are part of the "reactor" the other part being the MoGen itself.  The purpose of this combination is to "invert" the negative effect that CEMF has on consumption.  That is what it was designed to do, that is what it does, that is what was demonstrated.  That system has nothing to do with the three coil scenario.  Similarities can be drawn between the two. Do that if you want, but don't ask me to support your interpretation of my presentations.  I am telling you how to observe what I presented, you can choose to accept what I say about "MY" work, or assume to know and get nowhere. 


Now I will give you the floor once again leaving you with the following simple question.


Do you comprehend the three coil scenario?


Regards


Not all of us ignored nor ridiculed your videos.  It sucks that you took them down.


You had spoken of several different concepts and sometimes it is difficult to distinguish which concept you were referring to when the statements were made..


Is the three coil scenario a situation where you have two coils (and caps?) oscillating at different frequencies and the third coil from where you take your beat generated output?


Thanks

sm0ky2

Commutators such as the one you describe are only created as
Custom order parts.
There is literally no demand for such a component, other than
experimental research.


Mostly just NASA, and us.
I possess plans for such a commutator, obtained years ago,
If you want to know how to make one I can help you.


----------------------------------------------------------


Your comments on the Batteries, I do not fully understand
What you are saying.
I get the premise, true batteries will only charge at their max rate
And anything else you try to stick in will just circle past and be lost.


But "current rating" is a general average of total power stored in the battery.
For example your battery may say 2200mAh
This means that it can provide 2200mA for 1 hr.
This does not mean that the battery can't put out 22000 mA for 6 mins.
The current output is entirely dependent upon the load resistance.
Not the battery. (Except in a specific case)
Some batteries will overheat if you draw too much current.
And by this they are limited to some value,
this is not a % of the max charge rate, the two things are not related.
One is an electrochemical constraint, the other is a materials property factor
of the electrodes and casing.
Some batteries recharge faster than they discharge. But they are designed that way.


There is, (generally not given to you by the manufacturer except in the auto industry)
           a maximum current that the battery will provide, at dead short.
This is what most people read from their current meter, when they test a battery.
The value goes down as the battery discharges.
It becomes truly observable when external circuit resistance is lower than internal
battery resistance.


In the auto industry this value ( at max charge) is offered up as a sales gimmick.
People are more likely to spend money on a battery that says "100 cold cranking Amps"
Compared to one that only says 70.
What they don't realize in the starter motor on their car only draws 15-30 Amps at max torque.
That number doesn't mean anything. It's like a commercial.








Now to US - as experimenters, these high-current auto batteries hold a specific use value.
If our experiment requires a short duration, high current source. Some of them can hold their
own along side small homopolar generators. (For a limited time)


i think for people to understand your point it may be better stated to test the battery first.
Figure out how much charge current it will accept, at complete discharge, half charge,
and fully charged.


From that a scale can be made, a point of operation planned for, and the load current
Is then engineered to fit the battery.


Let's say you never let the battery drop below 50%
Now you have a range of current from 50% charged,
to when the battery is fully charged.
You design your load with this current range in mind
And (achieve 'ou' with the rest of your thing?) then you
won't be using more than you produce.









I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

AlienGrey

Quote from: Dave45 on January 19, 2017, 07:33:51 PM
Just for you sweetheart.
Wire core doesnt have to be a thick core, the core stays saturated.
hi just had a quick peek at your diagram, do you mean nano Henry or micro Henry as a nh will be almost a trough wire  8)  :D