ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[jbignes5]

Speak for yourself....you have not seen a demonstration.  The reason for this.....you're not on the list.  I am not referring you to my theory of operation, nor a demonstration. 



I am not obligated to share anything with you, and as far as why I am here....  you've expressed your opinion that I am troll now live with that.....

"Apparatus for Producing Ozone

For the record Tesla patented the bifilar coil under the patent titled:  Coils for Electro Magnets.  He never mentions however when he uses this particular winding! I have discovered that when you understand how his systems works, it becomes self evident where the coil should be placed.  As an example I offer the following:

454,622 System Of Electric Lighting

This patent predates the ozone patent.  I mention this particular one because of its simplicity.  In this patent Tesla makes use of the disruptive discharge, whereby a generator of low voltage charges an inductor (P).  The voltage is raised by secondary (S).  Secondary (S) charges capacitor (C).  Capacitor (C) discharges across the spark gap (a) through primary (P'), which induces a voltage of high frequency and potential in the secondary (S').  It is this second secondary winding which is a bifilar winding. 

This patent should be compared to the ozone patent, taking note of all similarities and all differences.  Once you comprehend these patents you will then have the proper tools for the production of any amount of gas be it hydrogen, oxygen, or any other gas you desire.

It should be understood that what we are demonstrating is nothing more than molecular excitation.  We are dividing, shifting, and concentrating the molecules within the medium (water).  All that garbage about electrons and what not is not needed, it only clouds the issue.  You are vibrating the medium, and through this action, are dissolving the molecular bonds established between hydrogen and oxygen, and simultaneously causing the hydrogen and oxygen to form stabilized groups of their own on opposing electrodes. 

Violently shaking the medium is one of Nature's methods.


Regard"

You can play your games but I know your intentions.

"Hi,

Please forgive my intrusion, I just wanted to offer the following.

I take interest in noting that no one has recognized that the production of ozone by high voltage discharge is a "Cold Fusion" process on the molecular level!  It is known that very little input energy is required for the production of enormous amounts of ozone gas.

Lets assume that an environment of air and and environment of water are one and the same, the only difference being the density of the medium in question. Tesla indicated in his ozone patent, that he had devised a means by which gasses other than ozone could be produced, unfortunately he never revealed how this device could be adapted to produce the other gasses, or did he.

Quote:

568,177 Apparatus for Producing Ozone

In my present improvement I have utilized appliances of this general character under conditions and in combination with certain instrumentalities, hereinafter described, which enable me to produce, without difficulty and at very slight expense, ozone in any desired quantities.

I would state the apparatus which I have devised for this purpose is capable of other and highly important uses of a similar nature, but for the purposes of the present case I deem it sufficient to describe its operation and effects when used for the purpose of generating ozone.

End Quote

It must be remembered Tesla wanted to burn/combust atmospheric nitrogen, and successful in doing so, the frequency and potential of the current required for this was hundreds of times greater than those required for the production of ozone.

In the open atmosphere the circuit in this patent 568,177 produces ozone, in a different environment.....

The bifilar winding is very special arrangement.  It was around long before the birth of Tesla, he was simply the one to recognize its importance and significance in the sphere of electricity.  Its true power and purpose can only be demonstrated when it is properly wound, and placed in a circuit specifically designed for its use, and therein lies the problem.  There are too many theories as to the bifilar coils purpose!


Regards"

Shall I continue?

ok then:

"You are the first person I have seen who like myself refers to CEMF as the soul of the machine, and who seems to have found what I have found, but in a different manner.  Namely, you appear to be demonstrating the blending of the  two special case voltage and current sources, special case because they have the ability to seemingly overcome any impedance offered to them.  Specifically, you have a voltage source that overcomes impedance combined with a current source which overcomes impedance.  You are combining the voltage generated by an inductors opposition to change in current, with the current generated by a capacitors opposition to changes in voltage. It feels good seeing you do this, and doing so with relays.  I don't think folks really appreciate or realize what you are showing, I do, and am glad to finally see someone else doing it.  I think Ismael Aviso was one of the first to do something similar, but he never showed anyone any specifics.


Keep up the excellent work.


Edit....for those who don't know...this is what the Tesla Ozone patent demonstrates....sorry for going off topic...


Regards

    Reply
    Quote
    Notify"

[forest]

Stanley Meyer completed what Tesla omitted.

[jbignes5]

You don't need my permission....


While you are at it, pull up everything everyone has posted on the subject since 2006 and fill up the rest of Stefan's space, I dont give a shit...LOL

Thats ok you are the one filling up space. How many times did you reply to post with only emoji's?

In all of your posts not one proof has been supplied. Not that I don't think along the lines of your thinking. I am highly content with Tesla's experiments which I have intermittently proven to myself. As for proving it to others, I am trying to get all of it together and coherent with proof of the experiments. It takes quite a while to unprogram myself from the traditional electronics I learned to work on consumer electronics. I still find myself going back to the established theories only to find that they don't work for this new Technique.

But for you there is a certain enjoyment from taunting others in the attempt to talk about Tesla. You taunt them instead of teach them. You belittle them, All the while showing no demonstration of your understanding by all of your previous posts. Not one link to anything that proves your theory.

In my attempt to educate I try to go back to the words of Tesla as the source and so do you but then thats where you stop. I on the other hand am working to first educate and get the ball rolling for others to think about these experiments and understand the methods fully so they can replicate it with understanding. You on the other hand say you have done the work without providing one proof of that work as you are requiring of me. Going back through all of your posts not one link provided by you has been posted of that work. Although you have stated you have demonstrated that already. Where is that link that you have provided as you have stated?

[barbosi]

In all of your posts not one proof has been supplied.

In his last youtube presentation, among other several things erfinder showed that acceleration under the load is possible.

To show your worth, can you present another method of acceleration under load?

[Jeg]

The correct answer is


B.  cap


Everyone I have asked got it wrong.....  Why do I consider the cap the fulcrum of the system?

First of all thank you for pushing us to deeper levels of understanding. Your contribution is so valuable to many of us!

You have already spoken about two mechanisms of storage. I see them both in this patent. I feel that you point to the condition that it needs for the flawless transfer of energy between the two different in quality storages. I think I understand why you don't care about tuning right here. We just want to transfer energy in one shot. We don't care about series resonance as we want to avoid oscillations. All the energy has to change storage in one single shot. The objective is for the less capacitive reactance.  Is that true?